...
首页> 外文期刊>International Urogynecology Journal >Comparison of transperineal and transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions and functional manoeuvres in continent and incontinent women
【24h】

Comparison of transperineal and transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions and functional manoeuvres in continent and incontinent women

机译:会阴和经腹超声在大陆和失禁女性自愿盆腔底肌肉收缩和功能动作评估中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Transperineal (TP) and transabdominal (TA) ultrasounds were used to assess bladder neck (TP) and bladder base (TA) movement during voluntary pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction and functional tasks. A sonographer assessed 60 asymptomatic (30 nulliparous, 30 parous) and 60 incontinent (30 stress, 30 urge) women with a mean age of 43 (SD = 7) years, BMI of 24 (SD = 4) kg m2 and a median parity of 2 (range, 0–5), using both ultrasound methods. The mean of three measurements for bladder neck and bladder base (sagittal view) movement for each task was assessed for differences between the groups. There were no differences in bladder neck (p = 0.096) or bladder base (p = 0.112) movement between the four groups during voluntary PFM contraction but significant differences in bladder neck (p < 0.004) and a trend towards differences in bladder base (p = 0.068) movement during Valsalva and abdominal curl manoeuvre. During PFM contraction, there was a strong trend for the continent women to have greater bladder neck elevation (p = 0.051), but no difference in bladder base movement (p = 0.300), when compared to the incontinent women. The incontinent women demonstrated increased bladder neck descent during Valsalva and abdominal curl (p < 0.001) and bladder base descent during Valsalva (p = 0.021). The differences between the groups were more marked during functional activities, suggesting that comprehensive assessment of the PFM should include functional activities as well as voluntary PFM contractions. TP ultrasound was more reliable and takes measures from a bony landmark when compared to TA ultrasound, which lacks a reference point for measurements. TA ultrasound is less suitable for PFM measures during functional manoeuvres and comparisons between subjects. Few subjects were overweight so the results may not be valid in an obese population.
机译:经会阴(TP)和经腹(TA)超声用于评估自愿性骨盆底肌肉(PFM)收缩和功能任务期间的膀胱颈(TP)和膀胱底(TA)运动。一名超声医师评估了60例无症状(30例未产,30例经产)和60例失禁(30例压力,30急迫)女性,平均年龄为43(SD = 7)岁,BMI为24(SD = 4)kg m2 两种超声方法的中位数均值为2(范围为0-5)。评估每项任务膀胱颈和膀胱底(矢状位)运动的三个测量值的平均值,以评估各组之间的差异。自愿性PFM收缩期间,四组之间的膀胱颈运动(p = 0.096)或膀胱底运动(p = 0.112)没有差异,但膀胱颈的差异显着(p <0.004),并且有膀胱底差异的趋势(p = 0.068)在Valsalva和腹部弯曲动作期间运动。在PFM收缩过程中,与失禁女性相比,大陆女性的膀胱颈抬高趋势很明显(p = 0.051),但膀胱基础运动没有差异(p = 0.300)。失禁妇女表现出在Valsalva和腹部卷曲期间膀胱颈下降增加(p <0.001),在Valsalva期间膀胱基础下降增加(p = 0.021)。在功能活动期间,两组之间的差异更加明显,这表明对PFM的全面评估应包括功能活动以及PFM自愿收缩。与TA超声相比,TP超声更可靠,并且可以从骨界进行测量,而TA超声缺乏测量的参考点。 TA超声不太适合在功能操纵和受试者之间进行比较时进行PFM测量。很少有受试者超重,因此该结果在肥胖人群中可能无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号