首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Financial Analysis >Why do CEOs agree to the discipline of dividends?
【24h】

Why do CEOs agree to the discipline of dividends?

机译:为什么CEO同意分红原则?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates dividend initiation as the product of the imbalance of power between shareholders and management in U.S. firms from 2003 to 2012. We find that dividend initiation is associated with a stronger governance structure (strong shareholders' rights and board independence), in accordance with the outcome model. We do not identify a single motivation for dividend initiation. Dividend-initiating firms tend to rely on various forms of governance balanced by the interests and ownership of CEOs and directors. Firms with institutional owners are more likely to initiate dividends concurrent with the turnover of the CEO. Dual CEOs initiate dividends when they own more shares, and boards of directors initiate dividends with a higher personal ownership stake when shareholders' rights are weak. We also find that when initiation is due to stronger governance, it is significantly related to the firm's investment opportunities, while for weak governance firms, that relationship is not observed. We interpret this as evidence that, under weaker governance, the decision to initiate dividends is motivated by agency conflicts rather than investment or capital structure considerations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究调查了从2003年到2012年,股息发起是美国公司股东与管理层之间权力失衡的产物。我们发现,股息发起与更强大的治理结构(强大的股东权利和董事会独立性)相关。结果模型。我们没有发现发起股息的单一动机。发起股息的公司倾向于依靠由首席执行官和董事的利益和所有权平衡的各种形式的治理。具有机构所有者的公司更有可能在CEO换手的同时发起股息。双重首席执行官在拥有更多股份时会发起股息,而董事会在股东权益薄弱时会以更高的个人所有权份额发起股息。我们还发现,当启动是由于更强大的治理而引起时,则它与公司的投资机会显着相关,而对于治理较弱的公司而言,则没有这种关系。我们将其解释为证据,表明在治理薄弱的情况下,启动股息的决定是由机构冲突而不是投资或资本结构考虑引起的。 (C)2017 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号