...
首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Financial Analysis >Global and regional stock market integration in Asia: A panel convergence approach
【24h】

Global and regional stock market integration in Asia: A panel convergence approach

机译:亚洲的全球和区域股票市场整合:面板融合方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper examines global and regional stock market integration in Asia at both the aggregate and disaggregate (industry) levels by applying the Phillips-Sul (2007) tests for panel and club convergence. Over both the whole sample (1998m12-2018m3) and the two sub-sample periods (i.e., pre- and post-2008 global financial crisis periods), the Asian stock markets appear to be integrated both globally (vis-a-vis the US) and regionally (vis-a-vis Asia) at the aggregate level, although the speed of convergence has decreased after the crisis. The industry level convergence tests reveals that, notwithstanding the aggregate convergence, there are 3 (i.e., Gas & Oil, Healthcare and Technology) out of 10 industries not exhibiting panel convergence in any sample period; further, no convergence is found for Basic Materials and Consumer Services in the pre-crisis period and Telecommunications and Utilities in the post-crisis period. The club convergence tests show this was due to the existence of convergence clubs, clubs in the turn-around phase, and divergent economies in these industries. Global and regional integration exhibited similar patterns in most cases, although the former appears to be stronger than the latter in the post-crisis period. We also find that trade linkages and stock market development promote Asia's regional stock market integration but not its global integration; real interest rate differentials and the recent financial crisis have slowed down both regional and global integration, while exchange rate risk and openness only affect the former.
机译:本文通过运用Phillips-Sul(2007)检验面板和俱乐部趋同性的方法,检验了亚洲(全球)和全球(区域)股市在整体和分类(行业)方面的整合情况。在整个样本(1998年12月至2018年3个月)和两个子样本期间(即2008年之前和之后的全球金融危机期间),亚洲股票市场似乎都在全球范围内整合(与美国相对) )和区域(相对于亚洲)的总体水平,尽管危机后的融合速度有所下降。行业水平趋同性测试显示,尽管存在总体趋同性,但在10个行业中,有3个(即,天然气与石油,医疗保健和技术)在任何采样期间均未出现面板趋同性;此外,危机前时期的基本材料和消费者服务与危机后时期的电信和公用事业没有融合。俱乐部趋同性测试表明,这是由于存在趋同性俱乐部,处于转型期的俱乐部以及这些行业中的经济差异造成的。在大多数情况下,全球和区域一体化表现出相似的模式,尽管在危机后时期前者似乎强于后者。我们还发现,贸易联系和股票市场发展促进了亚洲的区域股票市场一体化,但没有促进其全球一体化。实际利率差异和最近的金融危机减缓了区域和全球一体化,而汇率风险和开放只影响前者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号