...
首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Economics >Pitfalls in estimating β-convergence by means of panel data: an empirical test
【24h】

Pitfalls in estimating β-convergence by means of panel data: an empirical test

机译:利用面板数据估算β收敛性的陷阱:一项经验检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article aims to test the conjecture advanced in a recent work by Bianchi and Menegatti (Appl Econ Lett 14:963–967, 2007) that usual β-convergence panel regressions may produce biased evidence, due to their inability to distinguish between actual catching-up across countries and decreasing growth rates over time within countries. The test considers different sub-groups in a dataset of 72 countries for the period 1970–2000 and introduces both human capital and proxies for technological differences into the analysis. The results confirm the conjecture that traditional evidence about β-convergence may be misleading; they also show that catching-up across countries is weaker than usually claimed and that this process occurred only in some sub-groups of countries.
机译:本文旨在测试Bianchi和Menegatti最近的工作(Appl Econ Lett 14:963–967,2007)中提出的猜想,即通常的β收敛面板回归可能会产生有偏见的证据,因为它们无法区分实际捕获的食物和食物。各国之间的差距有所增加,并且随着时间的推移,国家内部的增长率不断下降。该测试考虑了1970-2000年期间72个国家/地区的数据集中的不同子组,并将人力资本和技术差异代理引入分析中。结果证实了这样的猜测,即有关β收敛的传统证据可能会产生误导。他们还表明,各国之间的追赶行动比通常声称的要弱,而且这一过程仅在某些国家中进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号