...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of economics >Percentage tax designation institutions. On Sugden's contractarian account
【24h】

Percentage tax designation institutions. On Sugden's contractarian account

机译:百分比税收指定机构。 在Sugden的合同账户上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

“Percentage Tax Designation Institutions”, also known as “Percentage Philanthropy Laws”, are fiscal institutions through which taxpayers can freely designate a certain percentage of their income tax to organizations whose main activity is of public interest: churches, third-sector organizations, political parties, etc. A comprehensive explanation of such systems is still lacking. In The Community of Advantage, Robert Sugden provides an original theoretical account of the Italian “8 × 1000” institution as one of those forms of regulation that “would be justified as ways of expanding opportunity for mutually beneficial transactions” and, more particularly, as a liberal and “contractarian approach to the provision of public goods”. This article is an attempt to expand and deepen the understanding not only of the 8 × 1000 but also of the 5 × 1000 and 2 × 1000 institutions, by reflecting on and possibly refining Sugden’s contractarian account, at least with regard to the part that relies on and develops the voluntary exchange tradition (Wicksell, Lindahl and Buchanan). To remain faithful to two normative premises of Sugden’s approach—the opportunity criterion and the correlated freedom of choice—we must introduce some theoretical adjustments to take into due account the way in which taxpayers’ freedoms—not only freedom of choice but also autonomy—are affected by default rules and the related redistribution procedures. In addition, these institutions also go beyond the voluntary exchange tradition—insofar as they go beyond its basic assumptions: the benefit principle of taxation, taxpayers’ self-interest and the very logic of exchange—and, at the same time, they can be read as a new form of voluntary tax justice.
机译:“百分比税收指定机构”,也被称为“百分比慈善法”,是财政机构,通过该财政机构,纳税人可以通过其自由地将其所得税的一定比例的所得税,其主要活动是公共利益的组织:教会,第三部门组织,政治缔约方等等缺乏这种系统的综合解释。在优势社区中,Robert Sugden提供了意大利语“8×1000”机构的原始理论述容,作为“将作为扩大互利交易的机会”的方式之一,更具体地,自由主义者和“提供公共物品的”合同方法“。这篇文章是通过反映和可能炼素的合约账户来延长和深化5×1000,也是5×1000和2×1000个机构的努力扩展和深化理解,而且还可以通过依赖于依赖的部分论和发展自愿交流传统(Wicksell,Lindahl和Buchanan)。为了忠于鉴于ugden的方法的两个规范性场所 - 机会标准和相关自由的相关自由 - 我们必须引入一些理论调整,以应对纳税人的自由 - 不仅自由选择,而且是自主的受默认规则和相关的重新分布程序影响。此外,这些机构也超越了自愿交流传统 - 因为它们超出了其基本假设:税收的利益原则,纳税人的自身利益和汇率的逻辑 - 以及同时,他们可以阅读作为一种新的自愿税法正义形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号