首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Economics and Finance >Do industrial and trade policy lead to excess entry and social inefficiency?
【24h】

Do industrial and trade policy lead to excess entry and social inefficiency?

机译:工贸政策是否会导致过度进入和社会效率低下?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper analyzes the welfare effects of industrial and trade policy instruments (output subsidies or/and import tariffs) in an international Cournot oligopoly and compares the social efficiency of specific policy instrument or dual policy instruments (output subsidies-cum-import tariffs) with free entry of domestic firms. It first demonstrates that free entry of domestic firms is always socially excessive irrespective of the policy regimes rate in an open economy. It then shows that optimal tariff rate and output subsidy rate under free entry of domestic firms will be lower than the one at regulated entry when the scale of domestic market is moderate; for dual policy regime, the optimal output subsidy rate at free entry is lower than the one at regulated entry, while the optimal tariff rate at free entry is higher than the one at regulated entry. Furthermore, even though the need of dual policy for welfare improvement is degenerate to be suboptimal with the free entry of domestic firms, but it is still superior to the subsidy policy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文分析了国际古诺特寡头垄断中工业和贸易政策工具(产出补贴或/和进口关税)的福利效应,并比较了特定政策工具或双重政策工具(产出补贴暨进口关税)与免费的社会效益。国内公司的进入。它首先表明,不管开放经济中的政策体制水平如何,国内公司的自由进入在社会上总是过分的。结果表明,在国内市场规模适中的情况下,国内企业自由进入的最优关税率和产出补贴率将低于规范进入的最优关税率和产出补贴率。对于双重政策体制,自由进入时的最优产出补贴率低于管制进入时的最优,而自由进入时的最优关税率高于管制进入时的最优。此外,尽管随着国内企业的自由进入,双重福利改善政策的需求已经退化到次优的水平,但它仍然优于补贴政策。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号