...
首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Economics and Finance >Combining the endogenous choice of the timing of setting incentive parameters and the contents of strategic contracts in a managerial mixed duopoly
【24h】

Combining the endogenous choice of the timing of setting incentive parameters and the contents of strategic contracts in a managerial mixed duopoly

机译:在管理混合双寡头中将激励参数设置时间的内生选择与战略合同的内容相结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study considers a game in which both the timing of setting the incentive parameters and the contents of the strategic contracts are determined endogenously. We investigate this game in a managerial mixed duopoly comprising a public firm with a welfare-maximizing owner and a private firm with a profit-maximizing owner. We suppose that the managers of both firms are employed based on their sales delegation contracts, which are equal to the weighted sum of their profits and sales revenues with respect to their FJSV incentive parameters. We show that two equilibrium market structures are possible in this game: (1) the market structure in which the owner of the public firm is the follower with a quantity contract and the owner of the private firm is the leader with a price contract and (2) the market structure in which the owners of both firms use price contracts and set their FJSV incentive parameters simultaneously in the late period. Furthermore, we show that the highest degree of social welfare can be achieved with the first equilibrium market structure. Therefore, the game considered in this study differs from the game in which both the timing of setting the incentive parameters and the contents of the strategic contracts are determined endogenously in a managerial private duopoly composed of two firms with profit-maximizing owners. Specifically, in the game considered in this study, it is unnecessary for the corresponding authority, such as the government, to regulate the free determination of both the timing of setting the incentive parameters and the contents of the strategic contracts based on each firm's individual incentive. In addition, since the cost functions and their quantities are represented under the technologies of both firms, we confirm the results concerning the equilibrium market structures and welfare implications obtained in the case where both firms have constant marginal cost functions with respect to their quantities.
机译:本研究考虑一种博弈,其中设置激励参数的时机和战略合同的内容都是内生决定的。我们在管理混合型双头垄断中调查此游戏,该垄断包括一家拥有福利最大化所有者的公有公司和拥有利润最大化所有者的一家私人公司。我们假设两家公司的经理都是根据其销售委托合同聘用的,这些合同等于其FJSV激励参数对其利润和销售收入的加权总和。我们证明了在这种博弈中有两种均衡的市场结构:(1)市场结构,在这种市场结构中,公有企业的所有者是具有数量合同的追随者,而私有企业的所有者是具有价格合同的领导者,并且( 2)两家公司的所有者在后期使用价格合同并同时设置其FJSV激励参数的市场结构。此外,我们证明,第一个均衡市场结构可以实现最高程度的社会福利。因此,本研究中考虑的博弈不同于在由两个拥有最大利润所有者的公司组成的管理私有双头垄断中内生地确定激励参数的时机和战略合同的内容的博弈。具体来说,在本研究中考虑的博弈中,相应的主管部门(例如政府)无需根据每个企业的个人激励来自由决定设置激励参数的时间和战略合同的内容。另外,由于成本函数及其数量都由两家公司的技术表示,因此我们确认了关于均衡市场结构和福利影响的结果,这两种公司在数量上均具有恒定边际成本函数的情况下获得了收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号