首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of urban and regional research >Urbanizing Refuge: Interrogating Spaces of Displacement
【24h】

Urbanizing Refuge: Interrogating Spaces of Displacement

机译:城市化的避难所:审讯流离失所的空间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Refugee spaces are emerging as quintessential geographies of the modern, yet their intimate and everyday spatialities remain under-explored. Rendered largely through geopolitical discourses, they are seen as biopolitical spaces where the sovereign can reduce the subject to bare life. In conceptualizing refugee spaces some scholars have argued that, although many camps grow and develop over time, they evolve their own unique form of urbanism that is still un-urban. This article challenges this idea of the camp as space of pure biopolitics and explores the politics of space in the refugee camp using urban debates. Using case studies from the Middle East and South Asia, it looks at how the refugee spaces developed and became informalized, and how people recovered their agency through 'producing spaces' both physically and politically. In doing so, it draws connections between refugee camps and other spaces of urban marginality, and suggests that refugee spaces can be seen as important sites for articulating new politics.
机译:难民空间已成为现代的典型地理区域,但其私密空间和日常空间仍未得到充分开发。它们主要是通过地缘政治话语呈现的,被视为生物政治空间,主权者可以在其中减少光秃秃的生命。在概念化难民空间时,一些学者认为,尽管许多难民营随着时间的推移而发展壮大,但它们仍在发展自己独特的城市化形式,这种形式仍然没有城市化。本文对难民营作为纯生物政治空间的概念提出了挑战,并通过城市辩论探讨了难民营中的空间政治。使用来自中东和南亚的案例研究,它研究了难民空间如何发展和变得非正规化,以及人们如何通过身体和政治上的“生产空间”恢复其代理权。通过这样做,它可以将难民营与城市边缘化的其他空间联系起来,并建议将难民空间视为阐明新政治的重要场所。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    ROMOLA SANYAL;

  • 作者单位

    The Bartlett Development Planning Unit, Faculty of the Built Environment, University College London, 34 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:26:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号