首页> 外文期刊>International journal of technology policy and law >Assange, WikiLeaks, and the liability of wiki providers for third party content
【24h】

Assange, WikiLeaks, and the liability of wiki providers for third party content

机译:阿桑奇(Assange),维基解密(WikiLeaks)和维基提供者对第三方内容的责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The uploading of US diplomatic cables onto the WikiLeaks' wiki website has sparked widespread outrage. After more than a year, US authorities are reportedly still considering whether they can prosecute WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange. This paper investigates prosecution grounds under US and Australian Federal law. There is a possible case for both Assange and Wikileaks to answer in the USA, but the proof stakes are high. This may account for the delay in the US authorities commencing any proceedings to date. There appear to be no serious grounds for prosecution under Australian Federal law. The analysis has important implications for IT law. Wiki providers would appear not to be liable for publishing on their wikis defamatory or other material that does not clearly threaten national security. Nevertheless, a prudent wiki provider would monitor and remove very sensitive information.
机译:将美国外交电报上传到WikiLeaks的Wiki网站上引发了广泛的愤慨。一年多之后,据报道,美国当局仍在考虑是否可以起诉WikiLeaks及其创始人朱利安·阿桑奇(Julian Assange)。本文调查了根据美国和澳大利亚联邦法律提出的起诉依据。在美国,Assange和Wikileaks都有可能回答,但是举证风险很高。这可能是造成美国当局迄今开始任何诉讼程序的延迟的原因。根据澳大利亚联邦法律,似乎没有严肃的起诉依据。该分析对IT法具有重要意义。 Wiki提供者似乎不负责在其Wiki上发布诽谤或其他不会明显威胁国家安全的材料。但是,谨慎的Wiki提供程序将监视并删除非常敏感的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号