首页> 外文期刊>The international journal for technology in mathematics education >A Comparison of Equality in Computer Algebra and Correctness in Mathematical Pedagogy (II)
【24h】

A Comparison of Equality in Computer Algebra and Correctness in Mathematical Pedagogy (II)

机译:计算机代数相等与数学教育学正确性的比较(II)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A perennial problem in computer-aided assessment is that "a right answer", pedagogically speaking, is not the same thing as "a mathematically correct expression", as verified by a computer algebra system, or indeed other techniques such as random evaluation. Paper I in this series considered the difference in cases where there was "the right answer", typically calculus questions. Here we look at some other cases, notably in linear algebra, where there can be many "right answers", but still there can be answers that are mathematically right but pedagogically wrong. We reformulate the problem in terms of articulating the sought-after properties, which may include both mathematical equivalence and algebraic form.
机译:在计算机辅助评估中,一个长期存在的问题是,从教学法上讲,“正确答案”与计算机代数系统或其他技术(例如随机评估)所验证的“数学上正确的表达”并不相同。在本系列的第一篇论文中,考虑了存在“正确答案”(通常是演算问题)的情况下的差异。在这里,我们看一下其他情况,特别是在线性代数中,那里可能有许多“正确答案”,但仍然存在数学上正确但在教学上错误的答案。我们从表达所寻求的属性(包括数学对等和代数形式)的角度重新提出问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号