首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of STD&AIDS >Does the sexually transmitted infections foundation course deliver and change practice? Feedback from delegates 2002–2006
【24h】

Does the sexually transmitted infections foundation course deliver and change practice? Feedback from delegates 2002–2006

机译:性传播感染基础课程是否实施和改变实践?代表反馈2002–2006

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Attendees at Newcastle sexually transmitted infections foundation (STIF) courses since 2002 were sent a postal questionnaire to ascertain views about the course, its effect on practice and the desire for further education. Totally 156 forms were returned (48% response). The majority 97% were satisfied with the course, 97% wanted updates, 57% annually and 33% biennially. Following a STIF course, 69% provided HIV testing (only 14% of those, prior to attendance). However, only 39% routinely offered HIV testing and only 34% routinely offered syphilis testing to patients whom they considered to be at risk of a sexually transmitted infection. Common reasons for not offering testing were lack of time for counselling, lack of confidence, no perceived need or anonymity concerns resulting in referral to genitourinary medicine. This was despite training, which encourages routine HIV testing with a pretest discussion rather than ‘counselling’ and education about recent outbreaks of syphilis.
机译:自2002年以来,向纽卡斯尔性传播感染基金会(STIF)课程的参加者发送了邮政问卷,以确定对该课程,其对实践的影响以及对继续教育的渴望。总共返回了156份表格(回复率为48%)。大多数97%的人对课程感到满意,97%的人希望更新,每年57%,每两年33%。参加STIF课程后,有69%的人提供了HIV检测(出勤前只有14%)。但是,只有39%的例行检查为那些认为自己有性传播感染风险的患者进行了HIV检测,只有34%的例行了进行梅毒检测。不提供检测的常见原因是缺乏咨询时间,缺乏信心,没有察觉到的需要或匿名性问题导致转诊泌尿生殖医学。尽管进行了培训,但仍鼓励进行常规的HIV检测,但要进行检测前的讨论,而不是对最近的梅毒暴发进行“辅导”和教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号