首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research >Comparing the Standards Lens with Other Perspectives on IS Innovations: The Case of CPFR
【24h】

Comparing the Standards Lens with Other Perspectives on IS Innovations: The Case of CPFR

机译:将标准视角与IS创新的其他视角进行比较:CPFR的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conceptual labels influence researchers?observations and analytic insights. This article aims to clarify the contributions of standards label by contrasting it with other ways of viewing the same entity and applying it to the IT-enabled supply chain innovation of Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment (CPFR). Proponents have labeled CPFR not only as a standard but also, at different decreasing levels of abstraction, as a business philosophy, methodology, and set of technologies. By comparing the analytic leverage offered by the different labels, we conclude that there is value in combining the standards perspective with other conceptual lenses. The specific case of CPFR also raises an interesting question for future research: Can information systems innovations justifiably be considered standardized in practice, if they are not standardized at all relevant levels of abstraction?
机译:概念标签会影响研究人员的观察和分析见解。本文旨在通过将标准标签与查看同一实体的其他方式进行对比,并将其应用于基于IT的协作计划,预测和补货(CPFR)的供应链创新中,来阐明标准标签的贡献。支持者不仅将CPFR标记为标准,而且在不同的抽象递减级别将CPFR标记为业务理念,方法和技术集。通过比较不同标签提供的分析杠杆作用,我们得出结论,将标准角度与其他概念角度相结合是有价值的。 CPFR的特殊情况也为将来的研究提出了一个有趣的问题:如果不是在所有相关抽象级别上都对信息系统创新进行标准化,那么在实践中是否可以合理地认为它们是标准化的?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号