首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Social Economics >Major issues relating to: end-of-life care Ethical, legal and medical from a historical perspective
【24h】

Major issues relating to: end-of-life care Ethical, legal and medical from a historical perspective

机译:与以下方面有关的主要问题:临终关怀从历史的角度看道德,法律和医学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Ethical, legal and medical progress has been made in end-of-life care, addressing crucial issues in the application of principles to clinical cases. However, despite the progress, there are still unresolved issues concerning the scope and effectiveness of personal decision making and the proper use of last resort measures in terminal care. An analysis of the progress discloses both the advances and the problems still confronting patients and their families. From this perspective, one gains a better understanding of the reality of terminal care and areas that call for reform. Design/methodology/approach - A historical analysis reveals the interrelation between moral and legal reasoning and their differences. It also discloses developments in the moral and legal realms that recognize rights of the patient with regard to treatment decisions. A critique of ethical and legal reasoning and medical practice pin-points the salient problems. Findings - There are still problems in the application of legal and ethical principles to specific cases. These problems are complicated by poor physician-patient communication, the ineffective use of advance directives and the impact of the market economy on comprehensive palliative care. These call for reform to protect personal rights and dignity at the end of life. Originality/value - A historical approach, too often lacking, promotes insight into the complexities of end-of-life care. An analysis flowing from such a perspective pin-points not only the advances in ethical, legal and medical practice but also the flaws and inconsistencies that call for a more realistic approach in reasoning and practice.
机译:目的-临终关怀在伦理,法律和医学上已取得进展,解决了将原则应用于临床病例的关键问题。但是,尽管取得了进展,但有关个人决策的范围和有效性以及在终极护理中正确使用后援措施的问题仍未解决。对进展的分析揭示了进展以及患者及其家人仍然面临的问题。从这个角度来看,人们对终端护理的现实和需要改革的领域有了更好的了解。设计/方法/方法-历史分析揭示了道德推理和法律推理及其差异之间的相互关系。它还公开了在道德和法律领域的发展,这些发展承认患者在治疗决策方面的权利。对道德和法律推理以及医学实践的批判指出了突出的问题。调查结果-在特定案件中法律和道德原则的适用仍然存在问题。医患之间的沟通不畅,预先医疗指示的无效使用以及市场经济对综合姑息治疗的影响,使这些问题变得更加复杂。这些要求进行改革,以在生命的尽头保护个人权利和尊严。原创性/价值-往往缺乏历史性方法,可以促进人们对生命终结护理的复杂性的了解。从这种角度进行的分析不仅指出了道德,法律和医学实践的进步,而且指出了需要在推理和实践中采取更现实的方法的缺陷和矛盾之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号