首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education >IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCIENCE WRITING HEURISTIC (SWH) APPROACH IN 8TH GRADE SCIENCE CLASSROOMS
【24h】

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCIENCE WRITING HEURISTIC (SWH) APPROACH IN 8TH GRADE SCIENCE CLASSROOMS

机译:第八级科学课堂中编写科学启发式(SWH)方法的实现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Current initiatives in science education in Korea have emphasized science literacy as the most important purpose of science education; that is, science education needs to focus on helping each student to become a scientifically literate person who is able to make reasoned decisions. In attempting to address this focus concern about science literacy, the researchers of this study attempted to implement the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach and examined both the SWH and the control groups using the modified Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). Students’ performance on a Summary Writing Test (SWT) was also examined. Participant students of this study were eighth grade students in three middle schools located in the second biggest city in Korea. Each of the three teachers from three schools taught both the SWH and the control classes. The results of this study showed significant differences between the SWH and the control groups on the SWT. There was a difference in the total RTOP scores between the SWH and the control groups. Differences among schools imply that higher level of teachers’ implementation of the SWH approach would appear to result in better student achievement.
机译:韩国目前在科学教育方面的举措强调科学素养是科学教育的最重要目的。也就是说,科学教育需要专注于帮助每个学生成为能够做出合理决定的具有科学素养的人。为了解决对科学素养的关注,本研究的研究人员尝试实施科学写作启发式(SWH)方法,并使用改良的《改革教学观察协议》(RTOP)来检查SWH和对照组。还检查了学生在总结写作测试(SWT)中的表现。这项研究的参与者是位于韩国第二大城市的三所中学的八年级学生。来自三所学校的三名老师中的每一位都教授了SWH和控制班。这项研究的结果表明SWH和SWT对照组之间存在显着差异。 SWH和对照组之间的总RTOP得分有所不同。学校之间的差异意味着更高级别的教师实施SWH方法似乎可以提高学生的学习成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号