首页> 外文期刊>International journal of river basin management >Response to Williams (2010) on Gard (2009): Comparison of spawning habitat predictions of PHABSIM and River2D models
【24h】

Response to Williams (2010) on Gard (2009): Comparison of spawning habitat predictions of PHABSIM and River2D models

机译:对Gard(2009)上Williams(2010)的回应:PHABSIM和River2D模型的产卵栖息地预测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Williams (2010) raises a number of interesting points with regard to the testing of instream flow models. Before responding to the critique and suggestions of Williams (2010), I note several inaccuracies in Williams (2010). River2D does not divide the study area into cells. River2D calculates depths and velocities at nodes of the triangulated irregular network, and then interpolates between the surrounding nodes to calculate depths and velocities at any given location. There are two types of two-dimensional (2D) hydraulic models - finite element and finite difference (Steffler and Blackburn 2002).
机译:威廉姆斯(2010)提出了有关流模型测试的许多有趣观点。在回应威廉姆斯(2010)的批评和建议之前,我注意到威廉姆斯(2010)的一些错误之处。 River2D不会将研究区域划分为多个单元。 River2D计算三角不规则网络的节点处的深度和速度,然后在周围节点之间进行插值以计算任何给定位置处的深度和速度。二维(2D)液压模型有两种类型:有限元模型和有限差分模型(Steffler和Blackburn 2002)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号