首页> 外文期刊>International journal of risk assessment and management >Risk management in carbon capture and geological storage: insights from a structured expert elicitation
【24h】

Risk management in carbon capture and geological storage: insights from a structured expert elicitation

机译:碳捕获和地质储存中的风险管理:结构化专家委托的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With a focus on risk management (RM) in injection and storage for carbon capture and geological sequestration (CCS), an expert elicitation of scientific judgements quantified collective uncertainty ranges for a number of difficult environmental and human health risk challenges. Results suggest similarities and differences in opinions, an outcome that may be reflective of both the newness and the complexity of this technology. A suitable monitoring period was estimated at about a century; however, uncertainty was three orders of magnitude, with an upper (5th percentile) value of almost 1,000 years. For selected low probability high impact georisks, only site selection and monitoring were considered 'very' effective RM options. Monitoring, well integrity studies, emergency response plan, automatic emergency shut down system and training were considered 'very' or 'extremely' effective in managing two risks more directly related to human health. Experts responded with a wide uncertainty spread for a regulated threshold of minor, major and catastrophic leakage. A companion paper discusses elicitation findings for issues related to risk assessment.
机译:在碳捕获和地质封存(CCS)注射和储存中注重风险管理(RM),对科学判断的专家倡议量化了集体不确定性范围,为许多困难的环境和人类健康风险挑战。结果表明意见的异同和差异,这一结果可能反映了这项技术的新性和复杂性。在大约一个世纪估计合适的监测期;然而,不确定性是三个数量级,上层(5百分位数)近1000年。对于所选择的低概率高影响Georisks,只有网站选择和监控被视为“非常”的有效RM选项。监测,完整性研究,应急响应计划,自动紧急关闭系统和培训被认为是“非常”或“非常”的有效,在管理与人类健康方面更直接相关的风险。专家们回应了广泛的不确定因素,以便对轻微,专业和灾难性泄漏的受管制阈值蔓延。伴侣论文讨论了与风险评估有关的问题的阐述结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号