...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of remote sensing >Evaluation of MODIS and NOAA AVHRR vegetation indices with in situ measurements in a semi-arid environment
【24h】

Evaluation of MODIS and NOAA AVHRR vegetation indices with in situ measurements in a semi-arid environment

机译:在半干旱环境中通过原位测量评估MODIS和NOAA AVHRR植被指数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Much effort has been made in recent years to improve the spectral and spatial resolution of satellite sensors to develop improved vegetation indices reflecting surface conditions. In this study satellite vegetation indices from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) are evaluated against two years of in situ measurements of vegetation indices in Senegal. The in situ measurements are obtained using four masts equipped with self-registrating multispectral radiometers designed for the same wavelengths as the satellite sensor channels. In situ measurements of the MODIS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and AVHRR NDVI are equally sensitive to vegetation; however, the MODIS NDVI is consistently higher than the AVHRR NDVI. The MODIS Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) proved more sensitive to dense vegetation than both AVHRR NDVI and MODIS NDVI. EVI and NDVI based on the MODIS 16-day constrained view angle maximum value composite (CV-MVC) product captured the seasonal dynamics of the field observations satisfactorily but a standard 16-day MVC product estimated from the daily MODIS surface reflectance data without view angle constraints yielded higher correlations between the satellite indices and field measurements (R~2 values ranging from 0.74 to 0.98). The standard MVC regressions furthermore approach a 1:1 line with in situ measured values compared to the CV-MVC regressions. The 16-day MVC AVHRR data did not satisfactorily reflect the variation in the in situ data. Seasonal variation in the in situ measurements is captured reasonably with R~2 values of 0.75 in 2001 and 0.64 in 2002, but the dynamic range of the AVHRR satellite data is very low—about a third to a half of the values from in situ measurements. Consequently the in situ vegetation indices were emulated much better by the MODIS indices than by the AVHRR NDVI.
机译:近年来,已经做出很大的努力来改善卫星传感器的光谱和空间分辨率,以开发出反映地面状况的改善的植被指数。在这项研究中,根据塞内加尔对植被指数的两年现场测量,评估了中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)和超高分辨率高分辨率辐射仪(AVHRR)的卫星植被指数。现场测量是使用配备有自注册多光谱辐射计的四个桅杆获得的,这些辐射计设计为与卫星传感器通道具有相同的波长。 MODIS归一化植被指数(NDVI)和AVHRR NDVI的原位测量对植被同样敏感;但是,MODIS NDVI始终高于AVHRR NDVI。与AVHRR NDVI和MODIS NDVI相比,MODIS增强植被指数(EVI)对密集的植被更敏感。基于MODIS 16天受限视角最大值复合值(CV-MVC)产品的EVI和NDVI令人满意地捕获了野外观测的季节动态,但根据不包含视角的每日MODIS表面反射率数据估算的标准16天MVC产品约束条件使卫星指数与实地测量值之间具有更高的相关性(R〜2值介于0.74至0.98之间)。与CV-MVC回归相比,标准MVC回归还采用原位测量值接近1:1线。 16天的MVC AVHRR数据不能令人满意地反映原位数据的变化。可以适当地捕获到原位测量的季节性变化,R〜2值在2001年为0.75,在2002年为0.64,但是AVHRR卫星数据的动态范围非常低-约为原位测量值的三分之一至一半。因此,MODIS指数比AVHRR NDVI更好地模拟了原地植被指数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号