【24h】

Everyday ethics: reflections on practice

机译:日常道德:对实践的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This introductory article frames the contributions for this issue on everyday ethics - moments that demand moral considerations and ethical choices that researchers encounter. We discuss concerns raised within the research community about the tendency to observe merely obligatory ethical procedures as outlined in Human Subjects Review regulations. We argue that these procedural rituals are manifestly insufficient for the moral challenges of ongoing and evolving research with people; we call for deeper engagement with the ethical dilemmas and defining moments that arise in the everyday conduct of research. We argue that considerations of ethics should be central to establishing the rigor or trustworthiness of research projects. Drawing on principles of systematic inquiry as transparent and grounded in conceptual reasoning, we describe research as praxis and the researcher as practitioner.View full textDownload full textKeywordsethics, moral practitioner, ethical reflexivityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.492813
机译:这篇介绍性文章从日常伦理学的角度探讨了该问题的贡献,这些时刻要求研究人员遇到道德上的考虑和伦理选择。我们讨论了研究界内部对仅遵守《人类受试者审查》法规中概述的仅遵循强制性道德程序的趋势的关注。我们认为,这些程序性仪式显然不足以应对与人进行的不断发展的研究带来的道德挑战。我们呼吁更深入地应对道德困境,并界定在日常研究中出现的时刻。我们认为,对伦理学的考虑对于确立研究项目的严格性或可信赖性至关重要。借鉴系统的探究性原则是透明的,并以概念推理为基础,我们将研究描述为实践,研究者则描述为实践者。 ::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.492813

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号