首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Civil servant identity at the crossroads: new challenges for public administrations
【24h】

Civil servant identity at the crossroads: new challenges for public administrations

机译:十字路口的公务员身份:公共行政的新挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - To compare and contrast the changes introduced in Canada and Switzerland as a result of public management reforms and explore the ethical challenges they entail. Design/methodology/approach - This is a case study of two countries based in part on secondary sources but also on observations made by the authors. Findings - The strategies used in each country are different reflecting their distinct political institutions. But there is a commonality, namely the emergence of new ethical problems related to the changes under way. Each country has tackled these new ethical challenges in similar ways. Individual and group behaviour of both Canadian and Swiss civil servants is regulated through "external controls" (codes of ethics, rules of conduct), but also by means of the socialization of new professional values (quality of customer service, flexibility, innovation, creativity, efficiency and effectiveness). These external controls and new values are insufficient, however, to allow civil servants to develop their own capacity for ethical deliberation, an essential condition for enhancing ethical behaviour in modern public administrations. Research limitations/implications - The findings are not based on a systematic comparative study and can only therefore be interpreted as indicative. Originality/value - The writers offer an interesting model relating to methods of behaviour regulation in an ethical public service and the need to ensure that the public good and the public interest remain at the core of public servants identity.
机译:目的-比较和对比由于公共管理改革在加拿大和瑞士引入的变化,并探讨它们带来的道德挑战。设计/方法/方法-这是对两个国家的案例研究,部分基于二手资料,但也基于作者的观察结果。调查结果-每个国家/地区使用的策略各不相同,反映了各自不同的政治制度。但是存在一个共性,即与正在发生的变化有关的新的伦理问题的出现。每个国家都以相似的方式应对了这些新的道德挑战。加拿大和瑞士公务员的个人和团体行为都通过“外部控制”(道德规范,行为准则)进行管理,还通过新的专业价值观(客户服务质量,灵活性,创新,创造力)的社会化来进行管理。 , 效率和有效性)。但是,这些外部控制和新的价值观不足以使公务员发展自身的道德审议能力,这是在现代公共行政管理中加强道德行为的必要条件。研究局限性/含义-研究结果并非基于系统的比较研究,因此只能解释为指示性的。原创性/价值-作者提供了一个有趣的模型,与道德公共服务中的行为调节方法有关,并且需要确保公共利益和公共利益仍然是公务员身份的核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号