首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Economics Review >Where did civil servants go? the effect of an increase in public co-payments on double insured patients
【2h】

Where did civil servants go? the effect of an increase in public co-payments on double insured patients

机译:公务员去哪儿了?增加公共共付额对双重保险患者的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In Portugal, Civil Servants may have a differential utilization of health services due to their supplementary Health Subsystem (ADSE), which grants them access to health services in the private sector at lower price. We exploit the impact of this double coverage on the demand for Portuguese Public Emergency Departments (ED), following the recent increase in co-payments for public health care services in Portugal.Using detailed ED level data from three different EDs, one for each level of the Portuguese ED care, we rely on a difference-in-differences strategy, under the assumption that both civil servants and National Health Service (NHS) users were targeted by the public co-payment increase, but just the former have a low-cost alternative in the private sector that they can use when prices increase in the NHS.We found that the existence of a low-price alternative in the private sector caused ED demand to decrease among ADSE beneficiaries following a policy that increased co-payments in public NHS hospitals. Specifically, we show that this decrease was only significant for conditions which have arguably the closest substitutes in the private sector – the low and intermediate-severity conditions – and to patients who lived closer to the ED and to whom the co-payment was the largest share of the ED visit cost.These findings cast some concerns over the equity of the Portuguese Health System, since civil servants increasingly opt out from public health services but must co-fund both the ADSE and the NHS.
机译:在葡萄牙,由于公务员的辅助健康子系统(ADSE),其公务员的医疗服务利用率可能有所不同,从而使公务员能够以较低的价格获得私营部门的卫生服务。在葡萄牙公共卫生服务的共同付款最近增加之后,我们利用双重覆盖对葡萄牙公共急诊部门(ED)需求的影响。使用来自三个不同ED的详细ED级数据,每个级别一个在葡萄牙的ED护理中,我们采用差异化策略,即公务员共同付费的增加是针对公务员和国民健康服务(NHS)用户的,但前提是前者的当NHS价格上涨时,私营部门可以使用的替代成本。我们发现,在私营部门中存在低价替代方案之后,由于增加了公共共付额的政策,ADSE受益人的ED需求减少了。 NHS医院。具体而言,我们表明,这种下降仅对可以说是私营部门中替代者最接近的疾病(低和中等严重程度疾病)以及居住在急诊室附近且共同支付额最大的患者而言意义重大。由于公务员越来越多地选择退出公共卫生服务,但必须共同资助ADSE和NHS,因此,这些发现引起了人们对葡萄牙卫生系统公平性的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号