首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >The effects of perceived funding trends on non-profit advocacy A national survey of non-profit advocacy organizations in the United States
【24h】

The effects of perceived funding trends on non-profit advocacy A national survey of non-profit advocacy organizations in the United States

机译:感知的资金趋势对非营利性倡导的影响美国对非营利性倡导组织的全国性调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper seeks to examine executive directors' perceptions of the relationship between access to funding and an organization's programmatic and advocacy activities. Design/methodology/approach - This study is based on data from a national survey of executive directors of non-profit advocacy organizations in the USA. The organizations were selected because they served minority and disadvantaged groups, and were heavily reliant on public funding. Findings - The findings indicate that several factors are associated with how organizations balance their programmatic and advocacy activities. They include dependence on public funding, constituencies served, and perception of funders. Despite evidence for institutional pressures to reduce advocacy activities, the results indicate that such activities are sustainable in organizations with a strong individual donor base. In essence, a stable source of grassroots resources can counter institutional pressures to reduce advocacy. Research limitations/implications - This study focuses on a specific subgroup of advocacy organizations. Although it offers insights into their perceptions, the findings do not necessarily reflect more general perceptions. Social implications - The findings enhance understanding of impediments to non-profit advocacy that stem from trends in public funding and regulations related to non-profit lobbying and advocacy activities. The findings also enhance understanding of the extent to which the influences of the emerging non-profit industrial complex are offset by traditional grassroots support for non-profit advocacy. Originality/value - This paper adds to the body of research on non-profit decision making in relation to the balance between programmatic and advocacy work. It adds to the understanding of how organizations interface with larger institutions in society and the constraints that institutional ties entail.
机译:目的-本文旨在研究执行董事对获得资金与组织的计划和倡导活动之间关系的看法。设计/方法/方法-这项研究基于对美国非营利性倡导组织执行董事进行的全国性调查得出的数据。选择这些组织是因为它们为少数群体和弱势群体服务,并且严重依赖公共资金。调查结果-调查结果表明,多个因素与组织如何平衡其计划和倡导活动有关。其中包括对公共资金的依赖,所服务的服务对象以及对资助者的看法。尽管有证据表明机构在减少倡导活动方面面临压力,但结果表明,此类活动在拥有强大个人捐助基础的组织中是可持续的。从本质上讲,稳定的基层资源来源可以应对减少倡导工作的机构压力。研究的局限性/含意-本研究集中于倡导组织的特定子组。尽管它提供了对他们的看法的见解,但发现并不一定反映出更普遍的看法。社会影响-研究结果加深了人们对非营利性倡导障碍的理解,这些障碍源于公共资金的趋势以及与非营利性游说和倡导活动有关的法规。这些发现还增强了人们对新兴的非营利性工业园区的影响在多大程度上被传统上对非营利性倡导的基层支持所抵消的理解。原创性/价值-本文将有关计划和倡导工作之间的平衡的非营利性决策研究纳入了研究范围。它增加了对组织如何与社会中更大的机构进行交互以及机构联系带来的约束的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号