首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Three conceptualizations of hybrid management in hospitals
【24h】

Three conceptualizations of hybrid management in hospitals

机译:医院混合管理的三种概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to bring the discussion on the relationship between management and medicine a step forward by focussing on: first, how the notion of hybrid and hybridity has been used in the literature on healthcare management. Second, the authors have mapped the alternative ways that the concept have been used in order to conceptualize a more specific set of possible combinations of managerial and professional roles in healthcare management. Hybrid management is a topic that ought to be important for training, communication among researchers and for identifying areas of future research: in management, in healthcare reforms, in sociology of professions and in theory of organizations. Design/methodology/approach - The authors provide a systematic literature review in order to map the various conceptualizations of hybrid management. The authors have searched for "hybrid leadership," "hybrid management" combined with hospitals and health care in a whole range of journals, identified in Google scholar, Academic Search Premier, Academic Research Library and Sage Publication. The authors have also used already existing literature reviews. The search has resulted in more than 60 articles and book titles that have been classified according to whether they make a fit with three alternative ways of conceptualizing hybrid management. The authors are aware that they might have missed some relevant literature but the literature included is quite comprehensive. Findings - In the literature the authors have found three conceptualizations of management. The clinical manager who combines professional self-governance with a general management logic. The commercialized manager who combines professional self-governance with an enterprise logic. The neo-bureaucratic manager who combines self-governance with a neo-bureaucratic logic. Originality/value - In most analyses of hybridity in management and organization the notion of hybrid has been used in a rather superficial way. By mapping the various uses of hybrid in the literature and suggest how a professional logic may be combined with a set of alternative logics of management the authors provide a platform for developing the concept of hybrid management into a more useful tool for analyses of changes in healthcare management.
机译:目的-本文的目的是通过着重于以下方面使管理与医学之间的关系的讨论向前推进:首先,如何在医疗保健管理文献中使用混合和混合的概念。其次,作者绘制了使用该概念的替代方法,以概念化医疗保健管理中管理和专业角色的一组更具体的可能组合。混合管理是一个主题,对于培训,研究人员之间的交流以及确定未来研究领域而言应该是重要的:在管理,医疗改革,专业社会学和组织理论中。设计/方法/方法-作者提供了系统的文献综述,以描绘混合管理的各种概念。作者在Google学者,Academic Search Premier,Academic Research Library和Sage Publications中确定的各种期刊中搜索了“混合领导力”,“混合管理”以及医院和医疗保健。作者还使用了现有的文献综述。通过搜索,已经找到了60多种文章和书籍标题,这些文章和书籍标题是根据它们是否适合概念化混合管理的三种替代方式进行分类的。作者意识到他们可能已经错过了一些相关的文献,但是所包括的文献非常全面。发现-作者在文献中发现了三种管理概念。结合专业自我管理和一般管理逻辑的临床经理。商业化的经理,将职业自治与企业逻辑相结合。将新的官僚主义与自我管理相结合的新官僚经理。原创性/价值-在管理和组织中的混合性的大多数分析中,混合性的概念是用很肤浅的方式使用的。通过对文献中混合动力的各种用途进行映射并提出如何将专业逻辑与一组替代管理逻辑结合的方法,作者提供了一个平台,可将混合动力管理的概念发展为分析医疗保健变化的更有用的工具管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号