首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Public Administration >Bringing Back Boss Tweed? Could At-Will Employment Work in State Government and, If So, Where?
【24h】

Bringing Back Boss Tweed? Could At-Will Employment Work in State Government and, If So, Where?

机译:带回老板花呢?州政府是否可以按需聘用工作,如果可以,在哪里工作?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The lead author of this article[1] has proposed ending civil service tenure in the U.S. bureaucracy. Yet these arguments lose their force when applied to state and local civil service systems. In many states and localities limited media scrutiny, limited political competition, the weakness of existing bureaucracies, and a relative tolerance for spoils-oriented patronage make radical civil service reform risky. We develop a ranking predicting which states make the best and worst candidates for radical civil service reform. State level independent variables include corruption, traditional party organizations, media capacity, party competition, and bureaucratic capacity.
机译:本文的主要作者[1]提议终止美国官僚机构的公务员任期。但是,这些论点在应用于州和地方公务员系统时就失去了作用。在许多州和地方,有限的媒体审查,有限的政治竞争,现有官僚机构的薄弱环节以及对以利益为导向的惠顾的相对容忍度,都使激进的公务员制度改革面临风险。我们制定了排名,以预测哪些州是进行彻底公务员制度改革的最佳和最差候选人。州一级的独立变量包括腐败,传统政党组织,媒体能力,政党竞争和官僚能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号