...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Psychoanalysis >Should we or shouldn't we? some aspects of the confidentiality of clinical Reporting and dossier access
【24h】

Should we or shouldn't we? some aspects of the confidentiality of clinical Reporting and dossier access

机译:我们应该还是不应该?临床报告和档案访问的机密性的某些方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, reservations are expressed about two deviations from analytic neutrality: when the analyst seeks the patient's permission for publication or presentation of clinical material and when the analyst allows the patient access to the dossier under ac- cess-of-information legislation. In the first case, concern centres mainly on the entangle- ment of the patient in the therapist's sanctioned version of their work, an entanglement that might inhibit future revisions of the patient's self-understanding.
机译:在本文中,对与分析中立性的两个偏差表示保留:当分析人员寻求患者的许可以发表或发表临床材料时,以及当分析人员根据信息获取法规允许患者访问档案时。在第一种情况下,关注主要集中在治疗师批准的工作中患者的纠缠,这种纠缠可能会阻碍患者对自身理解的进一步修正。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号