首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Outcomes of supply chain dependence asymmetry: a systematic review of the statistical evidence
【24h】

Outcomes of supply chain dependence asymmetry: a systematic review of the statistical evidence

机译:供应链依赖性的结果不对称:对统计证据进行系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This literature review scrutinises 41 quantitative studies dealing with dependence asymmetry in supply chains. Strategically, behaviours ranging from exploitation to win-win problem solving can arise. Five research questions are explored. The systematic literature review method and a content analysis was applied to articles from premier journals in operations management and supply chain management. We found the number of studies markedly rose over the past 15 years. Five outcome categories (i.e. performance, relationship characteristics, practice and process, information sharing, and innovation) and three subcategories (i.e. supplier, customer and partner dependence) were identified that encompass each of the sample studies. The most commonly used theories proved to be resource dependence theory and transaction cost theory. We examined whether dependence asymmetry resulted in overall benefits or detriments. There were largely positive significant results in performance, practice and process, and information sharing. The results in relationship characteristics and innovation were mixed. The overall picture was more complex than the stronger firm simply taking advantage of the weaker firm.
机译:该文献综述审查了41项处理供应链中的依赖性不对称的定量研究。战略性地,可以出现从利用剥削来解决的行为。探索了五项研究问题。系统文献综述方法及其内容分析应用于运营管理和供应链管理中总理期刊的文章。我们发现过去15年来显着上升的研究数量。五个结果类别(即绩效,关系特征,实践和流程,信息共享和创新)和三个子类别(即供应商,客户和合作伙伴依赖),包括每个样本研究。最常用的理论被证明是资源依赖理论和交易成本理论。我们检查了依赖性不对称是否导致总体益处或损害。性能,实践和过程以及信息共享的主要显着显着导致。关系特征和创新的结果混合。整体画面比较强大的公司更加复杂,只需利用较弱的公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号