首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Evaluating artificial intelligence heuristics for a flexible Kanban system: simultaneous Kanban controlling and scheduling
【24h】

Evaluating artificial intelligence heuristics for a flexible Kanban system: simultaneous Kanban controlling and scheduling

机译:评估人工智能启发式算法以实现灵活的看板系统:同时进行看板控制和调度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper evaluates several artificial intelligence heuristics for a simultaneous Kanban controlling and scheduling on a flexible Kanban system. The objective of the problem is to minimise a total production cost that includes due date penalty, inventory, and machining costs. We show that the simultaneous Kanban controlling and scheduling is critical in minimising the total production cost (approximately 30% cost reduction over scheduling without a Kanban controlling). To identify the most effective search method for the simultaneous Kanban controlling and scheduling, we evaluated widely known artificial intelligence heuristics: genetic algorithm, simulated annealing, tabu search, and neighbourhood search. Computational results show that the tabu search performs the best in terms of solution quality. The tabu search also requires a much less computational time than the genetic algorithm and the simulated annealing. To further improve the solution quality and computational time for a simultaneous Kanban controlling and scheduling on a flexible Kanban system, we developed a two-stage tabu search. At the beginning of the tabu search process, an initial solution is constructed by utilising the customer due date information given by a decision support system. The two-stage tabu search performs better than the tabu search with a randomly generated initial solution in both the solution quality and computational time across all problem sizes. The difference in the solution quality is more pronounced at the early stages of the search.
机译:本文评估了几种人工智能启发式方法,以在灵活的看板系统上同时进行看板控制和调度。该问题的目的是使总生产成本最小化,其中包括截止日期罚款,库存和加工成本。我们证明了同时进行看板控制和调度对于最小化总生产成本至关重要(与不使用看板控制的调度相比,成本降低了约30%)。为了确定同时看板控制和调度的最有效搜索方法,我们评估了广为人知的人工智能启发式算法:遗传算法,模拟退火,禁忌搜索和邻域搜索。计算结果表明,禁忌搜索在解决方案质量方面表现最佳。禁忌搜索还需要比遗传算法和模拟退火要少得多的计算时间。为了进一步提高解决方案质量和在灵活的看板系统上同时进行看板控制和调度的计算时间,我们开发了两阶段禁忌搜索。在禁忌搜索过程的开始,通过利用决策支持系统提供的客户到期日期信息来构建初始解决方案。两阶段禁忌搜索的性能优于禁忌搜索,它在所有问题大小上的解决方案质量和计算时间上都是随机生成的初始解决方案。解决方案质量的差异在搜索的早期阶段更为明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号