首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Technology alignment and business strategy: a performance measurement and Dynamic Capability perspective
【24h】

Technology alignment and business strategy: a performance measurement and Dynamic Capability perspective

机译:技术调整和业务战略:绩效评估和动态能力视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rapid changes in market structures and technology lead to misalignment between strategy and operations. Whist this phenomenon is most prevalent in technology-based manufacturing industries, utility organisations (e.g. electricity and telecoms) provide a useful context to explore the Performance measurement (PM) and technology alignment challenges from a Dynamic Capabilities Theory perspective where there is a progressive shift towards deregulated markets. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to explore the role of Dynamic Capabilities Theory and PM approaches in improving the alignment between business strategy and technology strategy (Level 1 alignment); second, to explore the role of Dynamic Capabilities Theory and PM approaches in aligning technology strategy with operational technology routines and practices (Level 2 alignment). In the absence of overarching theory, an inductive approach draws upon Dynamic Capabilities theory. Four longitudinal case studies are used leading to the development of a conceptual framework and propositions for multilevel technology alignment. Data from 38 interviews and 8 separate focus groups, documentation and participant observations (over a three-year period) are used. The theory-building process shows the need to identify and develop PM-based technology alignment Dynamic Capabilities (PM-DCs) which help in improving and maintaining alignment between business strategy and technology strategy (Level 1 alignment) and between technology strategy and technology practices (Level 2 alignment). This approach requires critically reflective action-learning approaches to identify and nurture these PM-DCs.
机译:市场结构和技术的快速变化导致战略与运营之间的错位。这种现象在以技术为基础的制造业中最为普遍,公用事业组织(例如电力和电信)提供了一个有用的背景,可以从动态能力理论的角度探讨绩效评估(PM)和技术调整方面的挑战,其中逐步向放松管制的市场。本文的目的有两个方面:首先,探讨动态能力理论和PM方法在改善业务战略与技术战略之间的一致性方面的作用(1级一致性);其次,探讨动态能力理论和PM方法在使技术战略与运营技术惯例和实践保持一致方面的作用(2级一致性)。在没有总体理论的情况下,归纳法借鉴了动态能力理论。使用了四个纵向案例研究,从而为多层技术一致性开发了概念框架和命题。使用了来自38个访谈和8个单独的焦点小组,文档和参与者观察结果(为期三年)的数据。理论构建过程表明,需要识别和开发基于PM的技术一致性动态功能(PM-DC),这有助于改善和保持业务战略与技术战略之间的一致性(1级一致性)以及技术战略与技术实践之间的一致性( 2级对齐)。这种方法需要批判性反思行动学习方法,以识别和培养这些PM-DC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号