首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Supply chain models with corporate social responsibility
【24h】

Supply chain models with corporate social responsibility

机译:具有企业社会责任的供应链模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Currently, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a critical issue because more than 88% of consumers think companies should try to achieve their business goals while improving society and the environment. This paper focuses on a CSR supply chain where an Original Equipment Manufacturer's (OEM's) sales can be significantly reduced because of its oversea supplier's social misconduct. Specifically, as in a conventional wholesale price contract the supplier determines its wholesale price and the OEM decides its order quantity, but in a CSR supply chain, the supplier can autonomously change its CSR cost once a minimum requirement is satisfied. A higher CSR cost means that the supplier invests more in its corporate social responsibility and the OEM's sales will be less likely to be influenced by negative CSR events. The equilibrium solutions show an important dilemma - although the supplier's profit increases in the basic CSR requirement, the supplier will always use the minimum CSR cost under the conventional wholesale price contract, which eventually leads to a low supply chain profit. Thus, we introduce two different contracts to handle this problem: the flexible quantity contract and the wholesale price incentive contract, which are, respectively, a 'tough' way and a 'beneficent' way for the OEM to solve the problem. Although the two ways cannot (always) coordinate the supply chain, we show that they both will significantly improve the supply chain performance. Our results also show that in some conditions, one strategy will dominate, whereas in different conditions the other strategy dominates.
机译:当前,企业社会责任(CSR)已成为一个关键问题,因为超过88%的消费者认为公司应该在实现改善社会和环境的同时努力实现其业务目标。本文关注的是一个CSR供应链,其中原始设备制造商(OEM)的销售由于其海外供应商的社会不当行为而可以大大减少。具体而言,就像常规批发价格合同中那样,供应商确定批发价格,而OEM确定其订购数量,但是在CSR供应链中,一旦满足最低要求,供应商可以自主更改其CSR成本。较高的CSR成本意味着供应商在企业社会责任方面投入更多,而OEM的销售将不太可能受到负面CSR事件的影响。均衡解决方案显示出一个重要的难题-尽管供应商的利润在基本CSR要求中有所增加,但供应商将始终使用常规批发价格合同下的最低CSR成本,最终导致供应链利润较低。因此,我们引入了两种不同的合同来处理此问题:灵活数量合同和批发价格激励合同,它们分别是OEM解决问题的“强硬”方式和“受益”方式。尽管这两种方式无法(始终)协调供应链,但我们证明这两种方式都将显着改善供应链绩效。我们的结果还表明,在某些情况下,一种策略将占主导,而在不同条件下,另一种策略将占主导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号