...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >Families of supply chain coordinating contracts in the presence of retailer effort
【24h】

Families of supply chain coordinating contracts in the presence of retailer effort

机译:零售商共同努力下的供应链协调合同系列

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we study supply chain coordination in the presence of promotional effort. A single retailer chooses the level of promotional effort to increase demand and the quantity ordered from a single supplier, who may also exert demand promotional effort. This paper is the first to study all possible coordinating contracts for the model with demand promotional effort(s). Specifically, we classify all coordinating contracts as belonging to one of five mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive families. For each family we find the necessary conditions and/or the sufficient conditions for the existence of a coordinating contract, as well as the minimum number of parameters required for a contract in that family. We show that different contract families have different levels of efficiency, flexibility, and required information for coordination. In addition, we show that no linear combination of "simple-format contracts", defined as wholesale price contract, buy-back contract, and revenue sharing contract, can achieve coordination except the extreme case where the retailer obtains zero profit We also investigate two extensions: one in which the retailer has other decisions besides order quantity and effort, and one in which both parties exert demand promotional efforts (hence the decisions structure is changed). We find that coordinating contract design is not significantly influenced by the number of the retailer's decisions or demand function formats, but by the decision structure. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们研究存在促销活动时的供应链协调。单个零售商选择促销活动的级别以增加需求,并选择从单个供应商订购的数量,该供应商也可以进行需求促销活动。本文是第一个研究具有需求促进作用的模型的所有可能协调合同。具体来说,我们将所有协调合同归为五个互斥和穷举性家族之一。对于每个家庭,我们找到了存在协调合同的必要条件和/或充分条件,以及该家庭中合同所需的最少参数。我们表明,不同的合同族具有不同级别的效率,灵活性和协调所需的信息。此外,我们表明,除零售商获得零利润的极端情况外,“简单格式合同”(定义为批发价格合同,回购合同和收益共享合同)的线性组合无法实现协调。扩展:一种是零售商除了订单数量和工作量以外还有其他决定,而另一种情况是双方都需要需求促进工作(因此决策结构发生了变化)。我们发现,协调合同设计不受零售商决策数量或需求功能格式的影响很大,而受决策结构的影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号