首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >Optimal decisions on investments in Urban Energy Cogeneration plants - Extended MRP and fuzzy approach to the stochastic systems
【24h】

Optimal decisions on investments in Urban Energy Cogeneration plants - Extended MRP and fuzzy approach to the stochastic systems

机译:城市能源热电联产厂投资的最佳决策-随机系统的扩展MRP和模糊方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The issue of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management is an ever increasing problem, especially because solid waste from industry and other Closed-loop Supply Chain Waste (CLSCW) is included in MSW. Dealing with very large amounts of MSW per capita is a global problem, forcing municipalities and industry to develop new systemic approaches and technological solutions. One of the well-accepted solutions is energy recovery from MSW and CLSCW. The Waste-to-Energy (WTE) policy significantly reduces the volume of waste disposed in landfills, influences the reduction of total greenhouse gas emissions, and gives the potential for generating electricity or developing co-generation of electricity and heat. Nevertheless, there are still high uncertainties regarding the optimal decision on investments in cogeneration plants. In this paper we shall not discuss the technical characteristics of plants. Our focus is on the choices regarding investment costs and efficiency which also depend on the uncertain demand for supply system products, which is in correlation with the quantity of waste. In general, the recovered items must be distributed from the recycling facility back to production, and waste items must be sent to landfills, for which taxes and fees have to be paid. Alternatively, waste items can be reversibly used as a source of energy with several technological methods-most commonly the burning process. The uncertain energy efficiency of cogeneration plants and the uncertainty of demand appear simultaneously. In this paper, the methods for supporting decisions in optimal investment or co-investment in the urban cogeneration plant in case of joint actions of local authorities responsible for MSW and CLSC managers is considered when energy efficiency is normally distributed or fuzzy, at volatile demand, which has never been studied jointly. Extended MRP theoretical results are compared to the solutions of fuzzy reasoning. We show how MRP Theory can be used for evaluating the investments, but also how fuzzy reasoning is losing its potential in case of lower demand. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:市政固体废物(MSW)管理的问题日益严重,特别是因为工业固体废物和其他闭环供应链废物(CLSCW)都包括在其中。人均处理大量MSW是一个全球性问题,迫使市政当局和工业界开发新的系统方法和技术解决方案。公认的解决方案之一是MSW和CLSCW的能量回收。废物转化为能源(WTE)的政策显着减少了垃圾填埋场处置的废物量,影响了温室气体总排放量的减少,并具有发电或发展热电联产的潜力。然而,关于热电联产厂投资的最佳决策仍存在高度不确定性。在本文中,我们将不讨论植物的技术特性。我们的重点是关于投资成本和效率的选择,这些选择还取决于对供应系统产品的不确定需求,这与废物的数量有关。通常,回收的物品必须从回收设施分配回生产中,而废物则必须送到垃圾填埋场,为此必须缴税。另外,废物可以通过多种技术方法可逆地用作能源,最常见的是燃烧过程。热电厂的不确定能源效率和需求的不确定性同时出现。在本文中,当能源效率正态分布或模糊,需求波动时,考虑了负责城市生活垃圾和CLSC管理者的地方当局联合采取行动时,支持城市热电厂的最佳投资或共同投资决策的方法。从来没有一起研究过。将扩展的MRP理论结果与模糊推理的解决方案进行比较。我们将展示如何使用MRP理论评估投资,以及在需求降低的情况下模糊推理如何失去其潜力。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号