首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management: An inter-temporal comparison of the food and automotive industries
【24h】

Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management: An inter-temporal comparison of the food and automotive industries

机译:可持续供应链管理中的动态能力:食品和汽车工业的间或互动比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper seeks to enrich the theoretical debate on dynamic capabilities (DCs) in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). By extending Beske et al.& rsquo;s (2014) study, a systematic literature review was conducted, and articles matching our inclusion criteria were analyzed from 2002 to 2018. Yet, two major additions are made. For the first time, two distinctive sectors, i.e., the food and automotive industry, are compared. Furthermore, a temporal perspective is provided by comparing two time periods (2002 & ndash;2013 and 2014 & ndash;2018) based on content as well as quantitative contingency analyses.The results for the food sector indicate a shift from & ldquo;standards and certifications,& rdquo; a central construct within the 2002 & ndash;2013 sample, to proactive strategies aiming for the integration of stakeholders in the 2014 & ndash;2018 sample. Similarly, the findings of the automotive industry indicate a shift from monitoring to joint development and knowledge management. Based on our comparison, the SSCM debate in the food industry appears more diverse in terms of practices and capabilities employed. In contrast, the analysis for the automotive industry indicates a focus on SCM elements instead of a comprehensive SSCM view.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to apply an intra- and inter-sectoral analysis combined with a temporal analysis within the SSCM domain. This provides evidence that the methodological approach taken allows distinguishing among both time periods and industries.
机译:本文旨在丰富可持续供应链管理(SSCM)中的动态能力(DCS)的理论辩论。通过延长贝克等人。’ s(2014)研究,进行了系统文献综述,并从2002年到2018年分析了我们的纳入标准的文章。然而,制定了两种主要添加。比较了两个独特的部门,即食品和汽车工业。此外,通过比较两个时间段(2002&Ndash; 2013和2014和Ndash; 2018)提供了时间的视角,基于内容以及定量的应急分段。食品部门的结果表明从&ldquo的转变;标准和标准认证,” 2002&Ndash中的一个中央构造; 2013年样本,旨在旨在纳入2014年和Ndash的利益攸关方的积极策略; 2018年样本。同样,汽车行业的调查结果表明从监测到联合开发和知识管理的转变。根据我们的比较,食品行业的SSCM辩论在雇用的实践和能力方面似乎更多样化。相比之下,汽车行业的分析表明,专注于SCM元素而不是全面的SSCM视图。对于我们所知,这是第一次应用跨部门间分析的尝试与内部的时间分析相结合SSCM域。这提供了证据表明,采取的方法方法允许区分时间段和行业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号