首页> 外文期刊>International journal of police science and management >Democratic policing, community policing and the fallacy of conflation in international police development missions
【24h】

Democratic policing, community policing and the fallacy of conflation in international police development missions

机译:民主警务,社区警务和国际警察发展特派团合并的谬误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In international police development missions it has become common practice to regard 'community policing' as a synonym for 'democratic policing'. It is argued here that democratic policing is the parent concept and that community policing is simply one among a range of possible manifestations of some, but by no means all, of the democratic policing ideals (in so far as they can be identified). To conflate the two, or even to recognise the difference yet accord equal status, is a category error. The result yields two corrosive products: incomplete application of democratic policing in every case, and cultural inappropriateness in some.
机译:在国际警察发展特派团中,将“社区警务”视为“民主警务”的代名词已成为一种普遍的作法。这里有人争辩说,民主警务是母体概念,而社区警务只是其中一些民主可能的理想(但并非全部)的可能表现形式中的一种(据可查明)。将两者混为一谈,或者甚至识别差异但又具有相等的地位,是一个类别错误。结果产生了两种腐蚀产物:在每种情况下均未完全实施民主警务,在某些情况下还存在文化上的不当之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号