...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management >A pilot study on normalized weighted approach to citation study: A case of logistics and transportation journals
【24h】

A pilot study on normalized weighted approach to citation study: A case of logistics and transportation journals

机译:标准化加权引文研究的初步研究:以物流和运输期刊为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The results from citation studies of journals have often been used as a benchmark in evaluating a faculty member's productivity for tenure, salary adjustment, teaching bad reduction and other areas. It is also often used in ranking academic programs of particular disciplines in universities. This paper attempts to rank the leading journals in the logistics and transportation discipline using three different approaches: total weighted score, total weighted score on citations provided by journals other than the journal in question, and standardized weighted score. A different weight is assigned to each citation depending on whether the article in question is written by single or multiple authors, there are multiple citations of the same study, or the citation is from author Is' own work. The, ranks of journals differ depending on the citation study methods used. A sample of 19 journals in the logistics and transportation fold for the year, 1999 was used as a sample space. The results of the study using the most objective and rigorous criterion, standardized weighted score, indicate that the top five journals in the logistics and transportation field are in order of their ranks, the Journal of Business Logistics, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Transportation Journal, Production and Inventory Management Journal, and Journal of Supply Chain Management Although this study reveals that the top three ranked journals remain stable regardless of the method used, there is strong evidence that the rankings of journals fluctuate widely based on volume and numbers of pages of the journals in question as depicted by the wide movements in Transportation Quarterly, Transportation Science and International Journal of Logistics. Standardized approach is a unique method to neutralize such bias in the citation study. Study limitations including study period of one year are discussed.
机译:期刊引文研究的结果经常被用作评估教师任职,工资调整,减少不良教学和其他方面的生产力的基准。它也经常用于对大学中特定学科的学术课程进行排名。本文尝试使用三种不同的方法对物流和运输学科中的领先期刊进行排名:总加权分数,所讨论期刊以外的期刊提供的引文总加权分数和标准化加权分数。根据所涉及的文章是由单个作者还是由多位作者撰写,同一研究是否有多篇引文,或者这些引文来自作者Is自己的著作,每种引文都将分配不同的权重。期刊的排名取决于所使用的引文研究方法。 1999年物流和运输领域的19种期刊的样本用作样本空间。使用最客观,最严格的标准,标准化的加权分数进行的研究结果表明,物流和运输领域的前五名期刊按其排名排列,《商业物流杂志》,《国际物流与物流管理杂志》 ,运输杂志,生产和库存管理杂志以及供应链管理杂志尽管此研究表明,不管使用哪种方法,排名前三位的期刊都保持稳定,但是有充分的证据表明,期刊的排名会根据数量和数量而大幅波动《运输季刊》,《运输科学》和《国际物流杂志》的广泛变动说明了所讨论期刊的页数。标准化方法是消除引用研究中此类偏见的独特方法。研究限制包括一年的研究期限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号