首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management >Epistemological Role Of Case Studies In Logistics: A Critical Realist Perspective
【24h】

Epistemological Role Of Case Studies In Logistics: A Critical Realist Perspective

机译:批判现实主义视角下案例研究在物流中的认识论作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop the paradigmatic justification for the use of casernstudies in logistics research. The argument is based on a critical realist (CR) ontology andrnepistemology. The current logistics paradigm's flat ontology - based on regularity - is replaced by anrnontology emphasising structures and mechanisms underlying actual events in the form of logisticsrnpractice and performance.rnDesign/methodology/approach - The approach takes the form of desk research, conceptual workrnand theorizing.rnFindings - Based on this CR view of the logistics domain it is argued that the justifications forrnconducting case studies lie in their ability: to reach the causal depth required for revealing the realrndomain of logistics activities and performance: to reveal the working of mechanisms in loosely coupledrnstructures showing open systems characteristics through a constant alternation between abstract andrnconcrete reasoning and; to include the causal powers and effects of agents' ascribed meanings. Also, itrnis argued, in contrast with Yin's work which refers to the possibility of generalising case studies, thatrnthe justification of case studies not only must refer to their complementary role in research but alsornmust build on groundings that allow this form of research to take a primary role in knowledgerncreation.rnPractical implications - The arguments have direct implications primarily for the scientificrnjustification for case studies in logistics. CR thinking in this respect offers a view in which case studiesrnshould be seen as a more legitimate method in logistics inquiries. Second, the paper has implicationsrnfor further work on the methods of using case studies in logistics: between what types of case studiesrncan one distinguish, and which practical guidelines regarding design and reasoning can be developedrnbased on the CR view?rnOriginality/value - The paper problematizes current research methodology in logistics. Based onrncritical realism, it presents a thorough and systematic justification for using case studies as a researchrnapproach.
机译:目的-本文的目的是为在物流研究中使用案例研究开发范式论证。该论点基于批判现实主义者(CR)本体论和辩证认识论。当前的物流范式的扁平本体-基于规律性-被以强调物流实践和绩效形式的实际事件为基础的结构和机制的动物学取代.rn设计/方法/方法-该方法采取案头研究,概念性工作和理论化的形式。 -基于这种对物流领域的企业责任观点,有人认为进行案例研究的理由在于其能力:达到揭示物流活动和绩效的真实领域所需的因果深度:揭示松散耦合的结构中的机制的作用通过抽象推理与具体推理之间的不断交替来实现开放系统的特征;包括代理人赋予的含义的因果力量和影响。此外,itrnis认为,与尹(Yin)的工作提到广义案例研究的可能性相反,案例研究的合理性不仅必须参考其在研究中的补充作用,而且还必须建立在使这种形式的研究成为主要研究对象的基础上。实践意义-这些论点主要对后勤案例研究的科学合理性具有直接意义。在这方面,企业责任思维提供了一种观点,在这种情况下,案例研究应被视为物流查询中一种更合法的方法。其次,本文对在物流中使用案例研究的方法的进一步工作具有启示:可以区分哪些类型的案例研究,以及可以基于CR观点开发关于设计和推理的实用指南?原始性/价值-本文存在问题当前物流研究方法。基于批判性现实主义,它提出了将案例研究作为研究方法的全面而系统的论证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号