首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management >Non-response bias assessment in logistics survey research: use fewer tests?
【24h】

Non-response bias assessment in logistics survey research: use fewer tests?

机译:物流调查研究中的无答复偏差评估:使用更少的测试?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to consider the concepts of individual and complete statistical power used for multiple testing and shows their relevance for determining the number of statistical tests to perform when assessing non-response bias. Design/methodology/approach - A statistical power analysis of 55 survey-based research papers published in three prestigious logistics journals (International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Journal of Business Logistics, Transportation Journal) over the last decade was conducted. Findings - Results show that some of the low complete power levels encountered could have been avoided if fewer tests had been used in the assessment of non-response bias. Originality/value - The research offers important recommendations to scholars engaged in survey research as they assess the effects of non-respondents on research findings. By following the recommended strategies for testing non-response bias, researchers can improve the statistical power of their findings.
机译:目的-本文的目的是考虑用于多重测试的单个和完整统计能力的概念,并显示它们与确定评估无响应偏差时执行的统计测试次数的相关性。设计/方法/方法-对过去十年中发表在三种著名物流期刊(《国际物流与物流管理期刊》,《企业物流期刊》,《运输期刊》)上的55种基于调查的研究论文进行了统计功效分析。结果-结果表明,如果在无响应偏差的评估中使用了较少的测试,则可以避免遇到的某些较低的完整功率水平。原创性/价值-该研究为从事调查研究的学者评估未回答者对研究结果的影响提供了重要建议。通过遵循推荐的测试无应答偏差的策略,研究人员可以提高其发现的统计能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号