...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of parallel programming >Concurrency Paradigms: Competitive, Coordinated, and Collaborative: Which Control Mechanisms are Appropriate?
【24h】

Concurrency Paradigms: Competitive, Coordinated, and Collaborative: Which Control Mechanisms are Appropriate?

机译:并发范式:竞争性,协调性和协作性:哪种控制机制合适?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Concurrent computation has been with us for over 50 years, and has become essential today. Concurrency paradigms affect the way we think about parallelism, the programs we try to write, the algorithms we choose, the performance we achieve, the errors we make, and the support mechanisms we need. The paradigms are not equivalent. Although each paradigm can usually be simulated in environments designed for a different paradigm, such a "Turing machine style" proof of computational equivalency does not establish equivalency in terms of the effort required to program solutions, the proclivity for solutions to be error-prone, or the comparable effectiveness of solutions. Two classic concurrency paradigms are reviewed. A third (not so widely recognized) concurrency paradigm is then discussed.
机译:并发计算已经存在了50多年,并且在今天已经变得至关重要。并发范例会影响我们对并行性的思考方式,尝试编写的程序,选择的算法,实现的性能,产生的错误以及所需的支持机制。范式是不等效的。尽管通常可以在针对不同范式设计的环境中对每个范式进行仿真,但是这种“图灵机风格”的计算等效性证明并不能在对解决方案进行编程所需的工作量,容易出错的解决方案的易性,或类似效果的解决方案。回顾了两种经典的并发范例。然后讨论第三个(尚未广泛认可的)并发范例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号