首页> 外文期刊>International journal of medical informatics >Do risk visualizations improve the understanding of numerical risks? A randomized, investigator-blinded general population survey
【24h】

Do risk visualizations improve the understanding of numerical risks? A randomized, investigator-blinded general population survey

机译:风险可视化会增强对数字风险的理解吗?一项由研究者盲目进行的随机总体人口调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Risk visualizations are often employed to support risk communication. However, their effectiveness in communication of single absolute risks remains unclear. We investigated the effectiveness of risk visualizations in conveying verbatim knowledge of single absolute risks among the general population.Methods: Randomly sampled members of the general Dutch population completed four basic risk conversions from percentages to natural frequencies and vice versa. By random investigator-blinded allocation, these conversions were supported by either icon arrays, pie charts, bar graphs or no visualization. Verbatim risk knowledge was scored as the number of conversions completed correctly.Results: 393 subjects were included. Overall, 60% of respondents answered all four questions correctly. Risk format (percentages vs. natural frequencies, p = 0.677) and risk magnitude (p = 0.532) were not associated with verbatim risk knowledge score. Younger age (p = 0.001) and higher education level (p < 0.001) were independently associated with higher scores. The use of risk visualizations was not associated with higher scores (OR = 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.69; p = 0.745). All three forms of risk visualization were equally ineffective. These findings held when stratifying by risk format, risk magnitude and user preference for a certain form of risk visualization. There were no significant interactions with age or education level.Conclusion: Risk visualizations did not improve conveyance of verbatim knowledge of single absolute risks, irrespective of age, education level, risk magnitude, risk format and form of risk visualization. Risk visualizations may therefore be less suitable for settings in which detailed conveyance of single absolute risks is the main objective, although their effect on user experience and perception of risk communication and subsequent patient activation and participation remains to be elucidated.
机译:背景:风险可视化通常用于支持风险交流。但是,它们在传达单一绝对风险方面的有效性仍不清楚。我们调查了风险可视化在一般人群中传递绝对绝对风险的逐字记录知识方面的有效性。方法:随机抽样的荷兰一般人群的成员完成了从百分比到自然频率的四个基本风险转换,反之亦然。通过研究人员的盲目分配,这些转换由图标数组,饼图,条形图或没有可视化来支持。根据正确完成的转换次数对逐字风险知识进行评分。结果:纳入393名受试者。总体而言,有60%的受访者正确回答了所有四个问题。风险格式(百分比与自然频率之比,p = 0.677)和风险大小(p = 0.532)与逐字风险知识得分无关。年龄较小(p = 0.001)和文化程度较高(p <0.001)与较高的分数独立相关。风险可视化的使用与更高的分数无关(OR = 1.08; 95%置信区间:0.69-1.69; p = 0.745)。这三种形式的风险可视化均无效。这些发现在按风险形式,风险大小和用户对某种形式的风险可视化的偏好进行分层时保持不变。结论:风险可视化不能改善单个绝对风险的逐字记录知识的传递,而与年龄,教育水平,风险大小,风险形式和风险可视化形式无关。因此,风险可视化可能不太适合以单个绝对风险的详细传达为主要目标的设置,尽管它们对用户体验和风险沟通感知以及随后的患者激活和参与的影响尚待阐明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号