...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of medical informatics >Allied health professionals' use of online evidence: a survey of 790 staff working in the Australian public hospital system
【24h】

Allied health professionals' use of online evidence: a survey of 790 staff working in the Australian public hospital system

机译:专职医疗专业人员对在线证据的使用:对澳大利亚公立医院系统中790名工作人员的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To measure the impact of a state health department policy to provide allied health professional staff with access to a point-of-care, 24 h, online evidence system in terms of awareness, use and clinical impact of the system on clinical practice; to identify perceived barriers to use, and differences in measures between seven professional groups (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech pathol-ogists, dieticians, clinical psychologists, pharmacists and social workers). Method: A convenience sample of 790 allied health professionals from 65 randomly selected hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed. Rates of use, frequency and types of resources accessed were calculated. Comparisons between professional groups were undertaken using Chi-square analyses and t-tests. Results: The results showed that 82% of allied health professionals had heard of the online evidence system, and of those 76% had used it. Pharmacists had the highest rates of use and social workers the lowest. Of users, 90% agreed that use of the system had the potential to improve patient care and 45% reported direct experience of this. Computer skills and easy access were significantly associated with use and frequency of use. Among non-users, lack of specific training in the use of the online evidence system and lack of time were the most frequently reported reasons for not using the system. However, among users there was no relationship between this training and the frequency or effectiveness of use, i.e. the ability to find the information required. Conclusions: Allied health professionals will use an online evidence system when it is provided, however there are marked differences in use by professional groups. General training aimed at improving computer skills appears more important in encouraging use of an online evidence system, than specific system-based training. Perceptions of organisational and professional support for allied health professionals to use online evidence as a legitimate part of their work play an important role in influencing system use.
机译:目的:评估州卫生部门政策的影响,以使相关的卫生专业人员可以使用24小时在线护理点系统,以了解该系统对临床实践的影响,使用和临床影响;以确定使用上的障碍,以及七个专业团体(物理治疗师,职业治疗师,言语病理学家,营养师,临床心理学家,药剂师和社会工作者)之间的措施差异。方法:从澳大利亚新南威尔士州65家随机选择的医院中抽取790名专职医疗保健专业人员作为样本。分发了一份自我管理的调查表。计算了使用率,频率和获得的资源类型。专业组之间的比较使用卡方分析和t检验进行。结果:结果表明,有82%的专职医疗专业人员听说过在线证据系统,而其中76%的人已经使用过。药剂师的使用率最高,社会工作者的使用率最低。在用户中,有90%的人认为使用该系统有可能改善患者的护理水平,而有45%的人表示对此有直接的经验。计算机技能和易用性与使用和使用频率显着相关。在非用户中,缺乏使用在线证据系统的专门培训和缺乏时间是不使用该系统的最常报告的原因。但是,在用户之间,这种培训与使用的频率或有效性(即找到所需信息的能力)之间没有关系。结论:专职医疗专业人员将在提供在线证据系统后使用它,但是专业团体在使用上存在明显差异。比起基于特定系统的培训,旨在提高计算机技能的常规培训在鼓励使用在线证据系统方面显得更为重要。对联盟医疗专业人员使用在线证据作为其工作合法组成部分的组织和专业支持的观念在影响系统使用方面起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号