首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Market Research >Binary choice vs ratings scales A behavioural science perspective
【24h】

Binary choice vs ratings scales A behavioural science perspective

机译:二元选择与评级量表行为科学的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper argues for the adoption of binary choice over ratings scales, from the knowledge that the majority of human decision making takes place in what Kahneman (2011) and others have described as 'system 1'. Negative issues associated with the use of ratings scales in surveys have been widely reported (e.g. Revilla 2015), with the binary choice response option having been proposed as a better method due to its elimination of a number of biases. Given that we regularly classify concepts, objects, organisations or other people in binary format using system 1, the binary choice response option would seem to provide a method not only less biased than ratings scales but, critically, more realistic.
机译:本文主张采用二元选择而非等级量表,因为我们知道大多数人类决策都是在Kahneman(2011)和其他人所描述的“系统1”中进行的。与调查中使用评分量表相关的负面问题已得到广泛报道(例如Revilla 2015),由于消除了许多偏见,因此建议将二元选择响应选项作为更好的方法。假设我们使用系统1定期以二进制格式对概念,对象,组织或其他人员进行分类,那么二元选择响应选项似乎不仅提供了一种比评级量表更少的偏见,而且更关键的是,更现实的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号