首页> 外文期刊>Assessment >Taking the Test Taker's Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments
【24h】

Taking the Test Taker's Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments

机译:采取考验者的观点:多维强制选择中的响应过程和测试动机与评级规模仪器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has been proposed as an alternative to the rating scale (RS) response format. However, it is unclear how changing the response format may affect the response process and test motivation of participants. In Study 1, we investigated the MFC response process using the think-aloud technique. In Study 2, we compared test motivation between the RS format and different versions of the MFC format (presenting 2, 3, 4, and 5 items simultaneously). The response process to MFC item blocks was similar to the RS response process but involved an additional step of weighing the items within a block against each other. The RS and MFC response format groups did not differ in their test motivation. Thus, from the test taker's perspective, the MFC format is somewhat more demanding to respond to, but this does not appear to decrease test motivation.
机译:已经提出了多维强制选择(MFC)格式作为评级比例(RS)响应格式的替代品。 但是,目前尚不清楚改变响应格式可能会影响参与者的响应过程和测试动机。 在研究1中,我们使用思想大声技术调查了MFC响应过程。 在研究2中,我们比较了RS格式与MFC格式的不同版本之间的测试动机(同时呈现2,3,4和5项)。 对MFC项块的响应过程类似于RS响应过程,但涉及将块内的项目相互称重的额外步骤。 RS和MFC响应格式组在其测试动机中没有差异。 因此,从测试接受者的角度来看,MFC格式有点要求响应,但这似乎没有降低测试动机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号