首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law >The Environmental Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
【24h】

The Environmental Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

机译:国际海洋法法庭的环境法学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This presentation starts out with an overview of the environmental jurisprudence of international tribunals and courts in the last decade. The author then examines the jurisprudence of the ITLOS and considers four issues that have arisen: the precautionary principle; environmental impact assessment; environmental co-operation; and jurisdiction over marine environmental disputes. Concluding, he asks what the jurisprudence tells us about the Tribunal's role in the LOSC dispute settlement system. First, the Tribunal's provisional measures cases have established the utility of the Article 290 procedure as a means of protecting the rights of other States but also the marine environment in general. Second, there is evidence in the case law of a desire to settle disputes between the parties in a way that contributes to the development of a consistent jurisprudence and of a willingness to interpret and apply Part XII of the Convention in accordance with the contemporary state of international environmental law. The Tribunal's record on marine environmental disputes is a positive one.
机译:本演讲首先概述了国际法庭和法院在过去十年中的环境判例。然后作者审查了《国际海洋法公约》的判例,并考虑了出现的四个问题:预防原则;环境影响评估;环境合作;对海洋环境纠纷的管辖权。最后,他问到该判例告诉我们关于法庭在LOSC争端解决系统中的作用。首先,法庭的临时措施案件确立了第290条程序的效用,既是保护其他国家权利的一种手段,也是一般海洋环境的一种保护手段。其次,判例法中有证据表明,希望以一种有助于解决一贯法理问题的方式解决当事方之间的争端,并愿意根据当代国际法的状态来解释和适用《公约》第十二部分。国际环境法。法庭在海洋环境纠纷方面的记录是积极的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号