首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Lifelong Education >Raising participation—or furthering exclusion? Regional lifelong learning strategies under scrutiny
【24h】

Raising participation—or furthering exclusion? Regional lifelong learning strategies under scrutiny

机译:提高参与度或进一步排斥?区域性终身学习策略受到审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article brings into question the issue of regional network strategies aiming at implementing structures of lifelong learning in the local context, the so-called learning communities. Facing a broad diversity in their implementation all over Europe, one can observe on the other hand much less effort to discuss conceptual frameworks that deal explicitly with this subject as a whole. Yet it seems essential to categorise these colourful patterns of practice and to identify key issues—notably with regards to the aspect of lifelong learning—to develop the discourse further and to render it adaptive to international debate. For this purpose the paper draws attention to three instrumental case studies of learning communities (a Norwegian one, an English one and a German one) that were conducted within an exploratory research strategy. Designed as a between-method triangulation, the case studies represent a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach by means of an anonymous questionnaire and half-standardised interviews. The members of the network and its key stakeholders from the meta-level were investigated just as the local framework itself. Hence, the study intends not only to demonstrate exemplarily the European variety of learning communities, their origins and leading structures, but also to propose a further structuring of the topic by introducing a typology of learning communities. This eventually opens up controversial issues about lifelong learning strategies in general; for example the question, if these strategies will possibly rather widen already existing structures of inequality and exclusion than raising participation in lifelong learning.
机译:本文对旨在在本地环境下实施终身学习结构的区域网络战略问题(所谓的学习社区)提出了质疑。面对整个欧洲实施的广泛多样性,另一方面,人们可以花费更少的精力来讨论可以明确处理整个主题的概念框架。然而,似乎有必要对这些丰富多彩的实践模式进行分类并找出关键问题,尤其是在终身学习方面,以便进一步发展论述并使之适应国际辩论。为此,本文提请注意在探索性研究策略中进行的三个学习性案例研究社区(挪威,英语和德语)。案例研究被设计为一种方法间三角剖分法,它通过匿名问卷调查和半标准化访谈来代表混合的定性-定量方法。与本地框架本身一样,对网络成员及其来自元级别的主要利益相关者进行了调查。因此,该研究不仅旨在示例性地展示欧洲学习社区的多样性,其起源和主导结构,而且还通过引入学习社区的类型学来提出该主题的进一步结构。最终,这引发了有关终身学习策略的有争议的问题。例如,问题是,这些策略是否可能会扩大现有的不平等和排斥结构,而不是增加对终身学习的参与度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号