首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >LCA of the timber sector in Ghana: preliminary life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)
【24h】

LCA of the timber sector in Ghana: preliminary life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)

机译:加纳木材部门的LCA:生命周期初步影响评估(LCIA)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Most life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approaches in life cycle assessment (LCA) are developed for western countries. Their LCIA approaches and charac terization methodologies for different impact categories may not be necessarily relevant to African environmental conditions and particularly not for the timber sector in Ghana. This study reviews the relevance of existing impact categories and LCIA approaches, and uses the most relevant for the timber sector of Ghana. Materials and methods The study reviewed 23 life cycle inventories (LCIs) and LCAs on forestry, timber, and wood products for relevant impact categories and LCIA approaches for their relevance to the specific conditions in Ghana. This study uses an earlier LCI study of the timber industry as a starting point for an additional LCIA. We next performed a correlation and regression analysis to learn whether wood wastes may function as a reasonable single indicator for land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and the other impact categories. Results and discussion The literature review shows that no LCI or LCA studies were developed for Africa or the tropics. The LCIA approaches in the reviewed LCAs are indeed shown to take their basis in the environmental problems in western countries and characterization method ologies relating to how these problems manifest themselves in the western world. Characterization methodologies for differ ent impact categories in CML-2000 and other LCIA approaches may not be necessarily relevant to African tropical environmental conditions and particularly not for the timber sector in Ghana. This situation hampers the reliability of our LCIA and points to a serious research gap in LCIA development in general. We applied the scientifically well-recognized CML 2000 to the earlier LCI results and characterized the preliminary selected impact categories of global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, and hu man toxicity. The correlation analysis indicated that wood waste is indeed strongly correlated with land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and also positively correlated with the other five potential impact results. It can be concluded that wood waste production is a major driving force for biodiversity loss and a sufficiently good single indicator for all other environmental performance indicators in the timber sector of Ghana. Conclusions This study and the previous LCI paper are pioneering a field not yet explored, since the correct environmental performance indicators are not yet devel oped or adapted to tropical conditions. The development of LCIA approaches in the tropics may be the start of a never-ending journey in LCA research in Africa, partic ularly Ghana.
机译:目的生命周期评估(LCA)中的大多数生命周期影响评估(LCIA)方法都是针对西方国家开发的。他们针对不同影响类别的LCIA方法和特性化方法可能不一定与非洲环境条件相关,尤其与加纳的木材部门无关。这项研究回顾了现有影响类别和LCIA方法的相关性,并使用了与加纳木材部门最相关的方法。材料和方法这项研究回顾了23种生命周期清单(LCI)和有关林业,木材和木制品的LCA的相关影响类别,以及LCIA方法与加纳特定条件的相关性。这项研究以较早的LCI木材行业研究为起点,开始了其他LCIA。接下来,我们进行了相关和回归分析,以了解木材废料是否可以作为土地使用的合理单一指标,以替代生物多样性的丧失和其他影响类别。结果与讨论文献综述表明,没有针对非洲或热带地区开展LCI或LCA研究。事实证明,经审查的LCA中的LCIA方法是基于西方国家的环境问题以及与这些问题如何在西方世界表现出来有关的表征方法学的基础。 CML-2000和其他LCIA方法中不同实体影响类别的表征方法可能不一定与非洲热带环境条件相关,尤其与加纳的木材部门无关。这种情况阻碍了我们LCIA的可靠性,并指出总体上LCIA发展方面存在严重的研究差距。我们将科学上公认的CML 2000应用于早期的LCI结果,并表征了全球变暖,酸化,富营养化,光化学氧化剂形成和人类毒性等初步选择的影响类别。相关性分析表明,木材浪费确实与土地用途密切相关,以替代生物多样性的丧失,并且与其他五个潜在影响结果也呈正相关。可以得出结论,木材废物的产生是生物多样性丧失的主要驱动力,并且是加纳木材部门所有其他环境绩效指标的足够好的单一指标。结论本研究和先前的LCI论文开创了一个尚未探索的领域,因为尚未开发出正确的环境绩效指标或使其适应热带条件。热带地区LCIA方法的发展可能是非洲LCA研究(尤其是加纳)永无止境的旅程的开始。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号