首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Critical analysis of life cycle impact assessment methods addressing consequences of freshwater use on ecosystems and recommendations for future method development
【24h】

Critical analysis of life cycle impact assessment methods addressing consequences of freshwater use on ecosystems and recommendations for future method development

机译:对生命周期影响评估方法的关键分析,以解决淡水使用对生态系统的影响以及对未来方法开发的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Anthropic water uses can affect aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems through various pathways. To address these impacts in life cycle assessment, an array of impact assessment methods can be applied. The currently well-known review of methods carried out by the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative's WULCAworking group (Kounina et al. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):707-721,2013) recommends that practitioners Bsimultaneously apply all indicators to evaluate damage on ecosystem quality and to cautiously sum up the score into a single metric". This call for caution is attributed to the fact that methods reviewed cover different ecosystem targets. Their characterisation factors and units also vary. However, the review lacks a detailed analysis of compatibilities and coherence between methods that identifies inconsistencies to be overcome to further method harmonisation. This is precisely the aim of this study.
机译:目的人类用水可以通过各种途径影响水生和陆地生态系统。为了解决生命周期评估中的这些影响,可以应用一系列影响评估方法。环境署/ SETAC生命周期倡议的WULCA工作组对方法进行的当前众所周知的审查(Kounina等人,Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):707-721,2013)建议从业人员同时应用所有指标进行评估对生态系统质量的损害并谨慎地将分数汇总为一个度量标准。”之所以需要谨慎,是因为以下事实:所审查的方法涵盖了不同的生态系统目标。它们的特征因子和单位也各不相同。但是,该审查缺乏详细的分析方法之间的兼容性和连贯性,确定了需要进一步解决的方法不一致之处,这正是本研究的目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号