...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Accounting for soil organic carbon role in land use contribution to climate change in agricultural LCA: which methods? Which impacts?
【24h】

Accounting for soil organic carbon role in land use contribution to climate change in agricultural LCA: which methods? Which impacts?

机译:土地利用贡献土壤有机碳作用对农业LCA气候变化的核算:哪种方法?哪个影响?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a key role in soil functioning and in greenhouse gas exchange with the atmosphere. Land use and land use changes can critically affect SOC. However, despite various methodological developments, there is still no scientific consensus on the best method to assess the holistic impact of land use and land use change within LCA. The SOCLE project aimed to review how SOC contribution to climate change is accounted for in LCA and to test the feasibility and sensitivity of best methodological options. Methods In total, five crop products (annual/perennial, temperate/tropical) and two livestock products were investigated through 22 scenarios of land use changes (LUC) and agricultural land management changes (LMC). Three methods were applied: IPCC Tier 1-2 (2006), Muller-Wenk and Brandao (2010) and Levasseur et al. (2012). We also carried out a sensitivity analysis on key variables, notably carbon stocks, reference states, and regeneration times. Results and discussion The accounting for LUC and LMC influenced greatly the results on the climate change impact. Compared to the impact of other GHG emissions, (i) LUC impacts ranged from - 23 to + 1702% with the IPCC method and from - 5 to + 336% with the Muller-Wenk and Brandao method, and (ii) LMC impacts from - 130 to + 54% and from - 31 to + 11%, respectively. The sensitivity analyses stressed the critical influence of all methodological and data choices on final results. Conclusions Based on the project results, we recommend accounting systematically for the impact of LULUC on climate change by applying,a minima, the comprehensive IPCC Tier 1 approach (2006), which provides default factors for SOC accounting. Where available, case-specific data should be used (e.g., Tier 2) for SOC stocks but also C:N ratio in order to model the degressive impact over 90% of the time period needed to reach equilibrium.
机译:目的土壤有机碳(SoC)在土壤运作和温室气体交换中起着关键作用。土地使用和土地利用变化可以严重影响SOC。然而,尽管有各种方法论发展,但仍然没有对评估LCA内的土地利用和土地利用变化的整体影响的最佳方法的科学共识。 SOCLE项目旨在审查LCA的SOC对气候变化的贡献如何,并测试最佳方法选择的可行性和敏感性。通过22种情况(LUC)和农业用地管理变更(LMC)调查了总共五种作物产品(年度/多年生,温带/热带)和两种畜牧产品的方法。应用了三种方法:IPCC Tier 1-2(2006),Muller-Wenk和Brandao(2010)和Levasseur等。 (2012)。我们还对关键变量进行敏感性分析,特别是碳储存,参考国家和再生时间。结果与讨论Luc和LMC的核算大大影响了气候变化影响的结果。与其他温室气体排放的影响相比,(i)Luc的影响与IPCC方法的影响为-33至+ 1702%,与Muller-Wenk和Brandao方法的-5至+ 336%,(ii)LMC影响 - 分别为-130至+ 54%,分别为-31至+ 11%。敏感性分析强调了所有方法论和数据选择对最终结果的关键影响。基于项目结果的结论,我们建议系统地占Luluc对气候变化的影响,通过申请全面的IPCC第一方法(2006),为SoC会计提供了默认因素。如果可用的,具体情况的数据应该用于SoC库存,但C:N比率为C:N比率,以便为达到均衡所需的时间段超过90%的时间段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号