...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Legal Medicine >Reclassification of SIDS cases—a need for adjustment of the San Diego classification?
【24h】

Reclassification of SIDS cases—a need for adjustment of the San Diego classification?

机译:对小岛屿发展中国家的案件进行重新分类-是否需要调整圣地亚哥的分类?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A study was undertaken reclassifying cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) taken from two geographically separate locations utilizing the San Diego definition with subclassifications. One hundred twenty-eight infant cases were examined from files at Forensic Science South Australia in Adelaide, SA, Australia over a 7.5-year period from July 1999 to January 2007. Thirty-one cases (24%) had initially been diagnosed as SIDS and 30 (23%) as undetermined while 67 (52%) had an explainable cause of death. After reclassification, the number of SIDS cases had increased to 49 of the 128 cases, now representing 38% of the cases; category IB SIDS constituted 10 (20%) and II SIDS 39 (80%) of the SIDS cases. No cases were classified as IA SIDS. Two hundred eighteen infant cases were identified from the files of the Department of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark over a 16-year period from 1992 to 2007. Eighty-two (38%) were originally diagnosed as SIDS, 128 (59%) with identifiable causes of death, and 8 (4%) as unexplained. After review, 77 (35%) cases were reclassified as SIDS, a decrease of 6%. Twenty (26%) infants were classified as category IB SIDS and 57 (74%) as II SIDS. None of the cases met the criteria for IA SIDS. Problems arose in assessing cases with failure to thrive, fever, and possible asphyxia. Modifications to the San Diego subclassifications might improve the consistency of categorizing these cases.
机译:进行了一项研究,使用圣地亚哥的定义和子分类,对来自两个地理上不同地点的婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)进行了重新分类。从1999年7月至2007年1月的7.5年期间,在澳大利亚南阿德莱德的南澳大利亚法医科学中心的档案中检查了128例婴儿病例。最初诊断为SIDS的有31例,占24%。 30例(23%)未定,而67例(52%)有可解释的死亡原因。重新分类后,小岛屿发展中国家病例增加到128例中的49例,现在占病例的38%; IB类SIDS占SIDS病例的10个(占20%),II类SIDS占39个(80%)。没有病例被归类为IA SIDS。从1992年至2007年的16年中,从丹麦奥尔胡斯大学法医学系的档案中发现了218例婴儿病例。最初诊断为SIDS的有82例(38%),其中128例(59%)有明确的死亡原因,还有8(4%)个原因无法解释。经过审查,有77(35%)个病例被重新分类为SIDS,下降了6%。 20例(26%)婴儿被归为IB SIDS类别,57例(74%)被归为II SIDS类别。没有一个案例符合IA SIDS的标准。在评估cases壮,发烧和可能窒息失败的病例时出现了问题。对圣地亚哥子分类的修改可能会提高对这些案例进行分类的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号