首页> 外文期刊>International journal of lean six sigma >Six Sigma and organisational ambidexterity: a systematic review and conceptual framework
【24h】

Six Sigma and organisational ambidexterity: a systematic review and conceptual framework

机译:六西格码和组织的灵活性:系统的审查和概念框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to analyse the relationship between Six Sigma methodology and organisational ambidexterity (exploitation and exploration orientations). For this purpose, this study describes how Six Sigma practices may enhance both orientations simultaneously, contributing to organisational ambidexterity and performance improvements. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review was adopted as the research methodology. The authors analysed 512 publications in Social Science Citation Index journals in fields such as management, business, operation research management science, planning development, behavioural sciences, interdisciplinary social sciences and applied psychology from 1987 to 2016, as the first development and adoption of Six Sigma was in 1987 by Motorola. Findings: This analysis describes how Six Sigma emphasises not only useful practices for exploitation orientation, such as customer input, design for manufacturability or improvement and control of processes, but also explorative practices, such as discovery, novelty or innovation. Consequently, an adequate combination of all these practices may enhance organisational ambidexterity and organisational success. Research limitations/implications: This study relies exclusively on previously published literature that fulfilled the selection criteria described in the search methodology. Further empirical research is necessary to test the propositions included in this paper. Practical implications: This study has important implications for academics, practitioners and employers, as it furnishes new theoretical insights to the scarce literature that studies the relationship between quality management practices and organisational ambidexterity. The authors provide a better understanding of Six Sigma philosophy and some fresh and new insight on how Six Sigma practices may help organisation develop distinctive competitive competences by its influence over exploration and exploitation orientations (ambidexterity). Therefore, it might be of interest to those practitioners interested in achieving a successful competitive position and discover emerging business opportunities, as it may provide some guidance on the important implication of Six Sigma practices over exploration and exploitation orientations. Originality/value: This study provides new insights into the non-existent literature about Six Sigma and organisational ambidexterity and to the scarce literature about quality management and ambidexterity. Propositions on how Six Sigma practices benefit organisational ambidexterity are also suggested.
机译:目的:本文的目的是分析六西格玛方法与组织灵活性(开发和探索方向)之间的关系。为此,本研究描述了六个西格玛实践如何同时增强两个方向,从而有助于组织的灵活性和绩效的提高。设计/方法/方法:采用系统的文献综述作为研究方法。作者分析了1987年至2016年间在社会科学引文索引期刊上的512种出版物,涉及管理,商业,运筹学,管理学,计划发展,行为科学,跨学科社会科学和应用心理学等领域,这是六西格码的首次开发和采用于1987年由摩托罗拉公司推出。调查结果:此分析描述了六西格码(Six Sigma)如何不仅强调针对开发的有用实践(例如客户输入,可制造性设计或流程的改进和控制),还强调了探索性实践(例如发现,新颖性或创新)。因此,所有这些实践的适当组合可以增强组织的灵活性和组织的成功。研究的局限性/意义:本研究仅依赖于先前发表的符合搜索方法中所述选择标准的文献。为了检验本文中包含的命题,有必要进行进一步的实证研究。实际意义:这项研究对学者,从业者和雇主具有重要意义,因为它为研究质量管理实践与组织灵活性之间关系的稀缺文献提供了新的理论见解。作者更好地理解了六西格码的哲学,并对六西格码的实践如何通过其对勘探和开发方向的影响(灵活性)可以帮助组织发展独特的竞争能力提供了一些新鲜的见解。因此,对于那些有兴趣获得成功竞争地位并发现新兴商机的从业者来说,这可能是感兴趣的,因为它可以为六西格玛实践对勘探和开发方向的重要意义提供一些指导。原创性/价值:这项研究为不存在的关于六西格码和组织歧义性的文献以及对于质量管理和歧义性的稀缺文献提供了新的见解。还提出了关于“六西格码”实践如何有益于组织灵活性的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号