首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and information technology >A country road: domain name disputes in .nz—is private dispute resolution working?
【24h】

A country road: domain name disputes in .nz—is private dispute resolution working?

机译:一条乡间小路:.nz中的域名争议-私下争议解决是否有效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Domain name dispute literature focuses largely on generic top level domains and the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy. Country code top level domains (ccTLDs) attract far less commentary. This article addresses this gap with a detailed evaluation of one ccTLD dispute resolution system: .nz. Evaluation of domain name disputes presents unique challenges: there is no single system for resolving disputes, diverse legal tests apply across jurisdictions and categories of disputes vary. The article examines .nz in light of these challenges, developing and applying evaluation criteria to draw conclusions about the number and categories of disputes, resolution rates and overall effectiveness. The article analyses cases, including appeals, under the "unfair registration" test which contrasts with Nominet's .uk dispute resolution policy on which the New Zealand system was closely modelled. The author concludes .nz operates a just and workable dispute resolution service that demonstrates effective and responsible ccTLD administration.
机译:域名争议文献主要集中在通用顶级域名和统一争议解决政策上。国家或地区代码顶级域名(ccTLD)吸引的评论要少得多。本文通过对一个ccTLD争议解决系统:.nz的详细评估来解决这一差距。域名争议的评估面临着独特的挑战:没有一个单一的解决争议的系统,跨司法管辖区的法律测试多种多样,争议的类别也各不相同。本文针对这些挑战对.nz进行了研究,并制定并应用了评估标准以得出有关争议数量和类别,解决率和整体有效性的结论。文章分析了在“不正当注册”测试下的案件,包括上诉,这与Nominet的.uk争议解决政策形成了鲜明对比,在该政策中,新西兰体系被严格模拟。作者得出结论,.nz运营着一个公正而可行的争议解决服务,该服务证明了有效和负责任的ccTLD管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号