首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and information technology >Is there a legal basis for blocking injunctions under Sri Lankan law?
【24h】

Is there a legal basis for blocking injunctions under Sri Lankan law?

机译:斯里兰卡法律是否有禁止封锁的法律依据?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Internet, in view of its expanse and the anonymity it offers to users, has posed significant challenges in the enforcement of Intellectual Property (IP) rights. This has motivated IP right-holders to alter their approach to IP enforcement-thus, instead of attempting to litigate against individual infringers, they have shifted their focus to intermediaries that provide access to or host online content. The purpose of this article is to consider whether the current procedural laws in Sri Lanka provide a basis for IP right-holders to seek injunctive relief against Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with the aim of compelling such intermediaries to adopt technical measures that block access to infringing online content-such injunctions being popularly known as 'blocking injunctions'. It is concluded that neither the Intellectual Property Act 2003, the law governing the protection and enforcement of IP rights in Sri Lanka, nor the provisions in the Judicature Act 1971 or the Civil Procedure Code 1889 provide a proper legal basis for injunctions that could compel an ISP to implement blocking measures.
机译:鉴于互联网的广泛性和向用户提供的匿名性,互联网在知识产权(IP)的实施方面提出了严峻的挑战。这激励了知识产权权利人改变其知识产权执法方式,因此,他们没有试图对个别侵权者提起诉讼,而是将重心转移到了提供访问或托管在线内容的中介上。本文的目的是考虑斯里兰卡的现行程序法是否为知识产权权利人寻求对互联网服务提供商(ISP)的禁令救济提供依据,以迫使此类中介机构采取阻止访问互联网的技术措施。侵犯在线内容-这种禁令通常被称为“阻止禁令”。结论是,《 2003年知识产权法》,关于斯里兰卡的知识产权保护和执法的法律,以及《 1971年司法法》或《 1889年民事诉讼法》的规定均未为禁止强制执行禁令的法律提供适当的法律依据。 ISP实施阻止措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号