【24h】

Privatising land in England

机译:英格兰土地私有化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to analyse the extent to which privatising - or denationalising land - has legal and policy effects. Design/methodology/approach - It applies the law in context scholarship to the question of land privatisation. Findings - Of all the recent privatisations in England, the most valuable, and yet least recorded, is of land. According to one estimate, two million hectares or 10 per cent of the Britain landmass, left the public sector for private ownership between 1979 and 2018. Privatisations include land that is sold, leased or where a public body changes its status. This paper aims to explore these privatisations, considering them as denationalisations, concluding that the effects are most significant in housing where the differences between social and private renting in relation to rents, the security of tenure and housing quality are striking. Moreover, although other public law restraints on the state-owned property are often limited, they are also still significant, facilitating scrutiny, particularly in combination with the public sector equality duty or site-specific duties for libraries, allotments or playing fields. All the sites disposed of to private developers, landlords and companies have lost these protections. Originality/value - This is the first time this question has been considered in this way from a legal perspective.
机译:目的-本文旨在分析土地私有化或土地非国有化在何种程度上具有法律和政策影响。设计/方法/方法-将上下文学术中的法律应用于土地私有化问题。调查结果-在英格兰最近进行的所有私有化中,最有价值,但记录最少的是土地。根据一项估计,在1979年至2018年之间,有200万公顷或英国土地面积的10%离开了公共部门,由私人所有。私有化包括出售,租赁或公共机构改变其地位的土地。本文旨在探讨这些私有化,将它们视为去国有化,得出结论认为,在社会和私人租金与租金,使用权保障和住房质量之间的差异显着的住房中,影响最为明显。而且,尽管其他公共法律对国有财产的限制通常很有限,但它们仍然很重要,便于进行审查,特别是与公共部门的平等义务或图书馆,分配地或运动场的特定场所职责相结合。所有处置给私人开发商,房东和公司的场所都失去了这些保护。原创性/价值-这是首次从法律角度考虑这种问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号